User talk:BrendanH

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Hello BrendanH, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

  • You can introduce yourself on the new user log.
  • You can find lots more information, including open tasks and daily tips, at the community portal.
  • You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp as well.
  • Before saving a page, it's a good idea to use the Show preview button to review your edits. Also, consider writing a summary for each edit.

Again, welcome! Chris Roy 06:48, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Brendan, you and I edited social class at the same time, and I think I may have accidentally discarded some of your valuable changes to that article. I will wait at least one hour before editing it again, to give you time to undo my "damage". --Uncle Ed 15:51, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)


I don't think any damage was done. (Does the Wiki not protect against this?) Your changes are generally very good -- this article needs a good spring-cleaning! BrendanH 16:23, Apr 7, 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Irish (English)

Please read talk:Hiberno-English#Irish (English). Cheers, Pædia | talk 17:55, 2004 Apr 29 (UTC)

[edit] Max Weber

I am adding info on Max Weber works, as well as trying to compile complete list of his books - as I see you are familiar with him, I'd appreciate your input on this.

--Piotrus 18:42, 31 May 2004 (UTC)

I will be putting ol' Max on Featured candidate soon, after 2 peer reviews I think he is ready for big time. I'd appreciate any last checks you could give the article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 00:58, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Hmm, I'll take your word on it - I don't have time to reread this article. So if you are sure you are right, then that's good :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:26, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hectare & km² discussion

You may want to join in the discussion at Wikipedia Talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Hectares, where we are trying to find a standard for the WP. Thanks! -- hike395 14:48, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Introvigne at Opus Dei

You may want to take a look at the Talk Page again. New data and arguments. Thanks. Lafem 10:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Egerton MS

There is a copy in the British Museum. SilkTork 07:46, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Ah - I see what you are talking about now - the reference in the Guinness article. Yes, if I remember, someone had stated in that article that stout was first used in relation to Guinness, and I made the correction using the Egerton MS as my source. Such a statement need not stay in the article as the article is about Guinness rather than stout. I haven't read through the article to see how correct the rest of it is, but that statement in the foreground of the article did stand out somewhat so obviously needed amendment. While a decent enough argument from available research could be put forward that the Guinness style of stout is indeed a unique Guinness development and other such dry 4.4% stouts are based on the Guinness style, it would be misleading to give anyone the impression that Guinness was the originator of stout or porter, or that Guinness is the only type of stout that is or has been made. Sorry, a long answer to a short question! Um. I don't know about online sources, but there are several books which do make reference to the history of stout and porter. Try a search on Amazon for stout - I just did and the first that came up Stout (Classic Beer Style Series: 10) is very good and does give a long history of the development of stout. SilkTork 16:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Well, bless me. I was just browing on Amazon and found this: Egerton MS reference SilkTork 16:20, 24 March 2006 (UTC)


Yes. Nice one. Go for it. I will be getting around to looking at stout at some point, but I doubt if that will be anytime soon. I have an article on the history and development of India Pale Ale promised for elsewhere to finish first. And I will, of course, be feeding the research for that into the Wiki IPA article eventually. SilkTork 16:45, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comments on Self-Fulfilling Prophecies

Hey there. Noticed that you made some comments previously on Talk:Self-fulfilling prophecy. Was wondering if you might drop into there again and give your view on the definition of what it should be. Seems that we have a loggerheads with myself and User:Ritchy and it would be good to get another opinion. Thanks Enigmatical 02:41, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../b/r/e/User_talk%7EBrendanH_d11a.html"