Talk:Brendan Joseland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

Portal	Brendan Joseland is maintained by WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports.
Assessment comments This article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

The page has significant content and should not be deleted by any means. Please remove the note suggesting this.

[edit] Please Remove the Speedy Deletion Tag

Please remove the speedy deletion tag. The tag was added when the piece was a work in progress and as it is now completed it is particuarly long and obviously no longer a candidate for speedy deletion

[edit] interesting

i would reccomend keeping this entry

[edit] Why does the content on this page keep getting deleted

I will stop putting it back together if someone can give me a valid reason as to why it keeps getting converted to a stub

I think all encyclopedia articles should be as detailed as possible, it's unfair to compare the article to say, Shane Watson who might not have as much information. It's like with footy articles, Alan Didak has more info than a legend of the game, Bob Pratt. Is it right? No. It means Pratt should have more info, not Didak should have less. Rogerthat ^Talk 00:21, 13 March 2006 (UTC)