Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SmackBot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.
[edit] User:SmackBot task approval XI
Operator: Rich
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic
Programming Language(s): AWB
Function Summary: To date undated mantenance templates in the category
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Dailyish
Edit rate requested: 6 edits per minute
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y
Function Details: Picks up all monthly sorted maint templates, and all the synonyms I could find. Also pickes up substed tags.
Rich Farmbrough, 22:34 17 November 2006 (GMT).
What are the maintanence templates this deals with? Please list those on the bot's page. This seems simple enough though.Voice-of-All 19:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Those that put things in subcategories of Category:Wikipedia maintenance categories sorted by month - currently
- {{:tl:wikify}}
- {{:tl:orphan}}
- {{:tl:uncat}}
- {{:tl:uncatstub}}
- {{:tl:cleanup}} and their synonyms.
- Rich Farmbrough, 22:39 20 November 2006 (GMT).
Seems good to me. Could a BAGer give this the nod for a trial, or indeed a full run? It's been listed here for over a week. Alai 13:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Approved for trial. Perform up to 50 - 100 edits and post the results here within 1 week. Make sure the test includes examples for the various categories listed above. -- RM 18:02, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Testing: See here
- Will add an exhaustive test page later. Rich Farmbrough, 18:09 27 November 2006 (GMT).
Approved. I don't need to see more. Had you provided diffs when this request was made I would have been inclined to speedily approve this. I swear another bot is already doing this exact same type of thing, but in any case, everything looks great. I noticed that in this edit that the bot also did some HTML correction. -- RM 18:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you. Rich Farmbrough, 20:24 27 November 2006 (GMT).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.