Talk:Botticelli (game)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You think you could make these directions are little more confusing? Good thing it's linked to the Berkeley site or no one would be able to figure it out -- even Harvard grads who have played the game.

Whoever wrote the above -- just criticizing isn't terribly helpful. Also, you could get an account and sign your comments... Auros 01:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Indirect, Section 2 -- error?

In Indirect, section 2 -- the parenthesized bit (If guesser was thinking of the chooser's person, then the guesser wins) makes no sense; if the chooser has answered "No" regarding the quality the guesser asked about, how could the guesser have been thinking about the chooser's choice? I guess one of them could be wrong, but that seems like an improbable situation. One imagines a chooser would pick, and a guesser would ask about, somebody they know a decent amount about. Auros 01:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC)