Talk:Boston and Lowell Railroad
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| See also: WikiProject Trains to do list | |
 |
This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance within the Trains WikiProject. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Boston; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
A Wikipedian removed Boston and Lowell Railroad from the good article list. There are suggestions below for improving areas to satisfy the good article criteria. Once the objections are addressed, renominate the article as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a review. |
On first look, this appeared to be a copyvio from http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:jNHg_Y1PzuEJ:www.angelfire.com/jazz/blackrainbow/files/B_L_RES_PAP.doc+%22Their+investors+spent+a+lot+of+money+on+the+Canal&hl=en , but http://osprey.sccs.swarthmore.edu/~cbr/ matches up the author of that paper (Jeff Kaufman) with the 'cbr2702' username, so no copyright paranoia needed here. --SPUI 23:36, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oh, good. I'll pull the copyvio notice. jdb ❋ 01:42, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Rather amazing how much vestigial writing lies around. This article was adapted from a paper I wrote for a history class, and I had used that account to transfer it.cbr 02:27, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Distances
Undated map at http://memory.loc.gov/
- Southern Division 181 mi
- Northern Division 172 mi
- White Mountains Division 185 mi
- Vermont Division 132 mi
- Central Massachusetts Railroad 44 mi
- 26.76 B&L mainline
- 6.20 Woburn
- .66 Horn Pond
- 2.37 Stoneham
- 12.25 Lawrence
- 16.88 Salem
- 3.25 Wilmington
- 9.25 Lexington
- 7.98 Middlesex Central
- 7.63 Bedford
total 93.23
- 14.58 Nashua and Lowell
- 13.16 Stony Brook
- 15.43 Wilton
- 10.50 Peterborough
total 146.9
- 29.59 Manchester and Keene
total 176.49 - this could be it if trackage rights to Salem are included
[edit] GA Re-Review and In-line citations
Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. LuciferMorgan 00:17, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Good Article Review
This article is currently under Good Article Review. LuciferMorgan 23:46, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] to those who may have been working on this longer than I have
Is it alright to create this template and then stick it somewhere on the page? The city subway pages have these, I thought maybe they'd do well out here too.
| Lowell Line
|
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.2 mi |  |
 |
Lowell | |||||
| 20.1 mi | |
|
North Billerica | |||||
| 32.2 mi | |
|
Haverhill | |||||
| 14.6 mi | |
|
Wilmington | |||||
| 11.5 mi | |
|
Anderson RTC | |||||
| 10.5 mi | |
|
Mishawum | |||||
| 06.8 mi | |
Winchester Center | ||||||
| 06.3 mi | |
Wedgemere | ||||||
| 04.4 mi | |
West Medford | ||||||
| 00.0 mi | |
|
|
|
North Station | |||
shuffdog 08:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Personally, I think the article's too long already, because it covers both the history of the line as a complete railroad, and its current status as part of the commuter rail. I think a division should be made between articles about the historic line and the current MBTA operation, breaking off the modern MBTA line into a separate article (where your template would fit well), leaving just a small summary here and a link to that article. But that would be quite a change. - DavidWBrooks 15:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
I agree the article should be split up between a historical article and a current MBTA operation article and I have tagged it as such. I also love that template. DHimmelspach 00:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Result of the GAR
[edit] Boston and Lowell Railroad
- result:Delist 4-0
Warned 5 weeks ago by me regarding lack of inline citations. Delist. LuciferMorgan 23:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- delist Sumoeagle179 13:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delist, all three of these articles have not improved since they were notified of their status. Teemu08 20:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delist No inline references. M3tal H3ad 08:24, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
This is the consensus to delist. Diez2 16:44, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Split
I agree
I plan to start a History of Lowell, Massachusetts article, and I linked this article into my template stub. The fact that this article is as much about the current MBTA commuter line as the historical line makes it awkward. CSZero 14:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
