Talk:Bose computer speakers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 3 August 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Contents |
[edit] Retail price incorrect on MediaMate section
I'm pretty sure they didn't initially retail (in 1994) for just $99. I believe they were $299. I was going to change just that price but it would have messed up the whole sentence. I believe they spend a lot of time at something like $189 on their way down the charts, too.
[edit] New Page Needs some TLC
Well I have quickly put up some information on the Bose Computer speakers and there is a lot left out. You may notice that the Companion 3's are before the Companion 2's. No this is not an error. the Companion 3's came out before the 2's. The 3's were sold along side the MediaMates for some time before the 2's arrived. Since eveything here probably should be put in chronological order this would be correct. Hope that this page becomes as informative as the Bose Headphone Family has become (c:= UKPhoenix79 08:29, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Companion 3 specs
I did not want to post these on the specs area incase they are inaccurate.
RMS IEC Rating fro power handling is 18watts for the twiddlers and 60watts for the RichBass woofer in the acoustimass.
I have sources which tell me the frequency response is roughly: 40hz - 18khz - flat. The system however does deliver deeper bass notes, due to the lack of X-over. It starts rolling off at 45-50Hz, but will manage to keep going till about 35Hz but with slight less power than 40Hz, probably -6db.
The companion 2s reach about 60Hz then start to roll off (lack of x-over means the drivers tend to crackle on low bass), the lows are heavily optimised in the 60-80 range and can sound boomy.
[edit] Blow the warranty information
There's no need to display the Warranty information for NPOV purposes. Nuff said. — Vesther (U * T/R * CTD) 03:04, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Edited it a bit, but still looks too awkward. — Vesther (U * T/R * CTD) 03:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Repolished, but still looks like an advert plus too many bugs
I repolished the article so that it would look like an advert, but I have insufficient information to make it the way Wiki wants it, so I'm going to have to leave the Advert concern in the article for now, but also there are bugs that need to be addressed as well. Until the article is polished to the way Wiki wants it, I'm going to have to say that this is still a heavily bug-infested article. — Vesther (U * T/R * CTD) 19:02, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
