User talk:Bondegezou
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Bondegezou, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 21:38, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Wikipedia survey
Hi. I'm doing a survey of Wikipedia editors as part of a class research project. It's quick, anonymous, and the data will be made available to the Wikipedia community later this month. Would you like to take part? More info here. Thanks! Nonplus 01:11, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] John Sinclair
I added to your information about John Sinclair at Jill Sinclair. His bio often includes a reference to the fact that he 'is the producer of "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" and "Queen - Bohemian Rhapsody".' [1] Do you know anything about that? Rabbi-m 02:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm afraid not. He played on the second Buggles album, Adventures in Modern Recording,[2] but I don't know much more about him. Bondegezou 11:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Yes
Can you put in a comment/citation about Yes´ number ones on the Bill Bruford page? Thanks. andreasegde 00:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not certain it's particularly relevant on the Bruford page, but the band's UK and US chart history is recorded on their Wikipedia page: Tales from Topographic Oceans and Going for the One were both UK #1s. Bondegezou 11:44, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Canterbury Sound
Would you consider a category "Canterbury sound" useful? Best regards, --BNutzer 21:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- I think that would be a very good idea, yes! Bondegezou 16:10, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- So be it: Category:Canterbury sound! Cheers, --BNutzer 23:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Update
In the description of the Category:Canterbury sound, I would like to see mentioned that quite a few of the bands/musicians are still active today, but I am not sure how to put that into english words properly, maybe you could add a (sub-)sentence saying so? Cheers, BNutzer 12:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Caravan of Dreams (band)
Maybe you can add some info (like the first line-up with Mark Hewins)? Cheers, --BNutzer 16:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- I got a bit carried away and added a whole section on predecessor band Going Going (and created a re-direct from Going Going)! Thanks for your work on some of the other Canterbury scene articles. Bondegezou 10:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] John Etheridge
Hi, I have just added him (and a few basic sources links) to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Jazz#Requested_articles, so, if you're interested, hurry up before someone else does it ;) Cheers, BNutzer 20:13, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] FYI: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Jazz#Category:Jazz_fusion_groups_has_been_created
BNutzer 07:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Susanne Lewis
A tag has been placed on Susanne Lewis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write {{hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Missvain 05:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mark Foley Scandal
Please note that I have just nominated Mark Foley Scandal for Featured Article status. You can find comments about its nomination here. I am leaving this message because you have significantly contributed to the article. Thesmothete 02:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar
The Current Events Barnstar | ||
With thanks for your many contributions to Liberal Democrats leadership election, 2006 at the start of the year. Timrollpickering 19:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] see what talk page?
You wrote in your edit summary - [3] - see Talk page but you did not write anything in Talk:Serbian parliamentary election, 2007 were you referring to another talk page? Thanks. // Laughing Man 15:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- I was referring to the discussion there under the subheading "Voting in Kosovo?" Bondegezou 15:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- I still do not see any comments by you there in that section. What is the basis for your edits? // Laughing Man 16:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- I was referring to other people's comments there; not my own. This does not seem like a contentious issue to me, but I'll look for some good citations in due course. You can also try asking the discussants on the Talk page for some citations. In the mean time, I've inserted a "citation needed" tag, which seems the best way forward. Bondegezou 16:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- My issue is that I feel like adding this, without giving the background on to why the voters are not registered is also misleading, and should be noted. In any case, I will try to find some time to work on the article and find sources and expand upon what you have added. Thanks. // Laughing Man 16:17, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- I was referring to other people's comments there; not my own. This does not seem like a contentious issue to me, but I'll look for some good citations in due course. You can also try asking the discussants on the Talk page for some citations. In the mean time, I've inserted a "citation needed" tag, which seems the best way forward. Bondegezou 16:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- I still do not see any comments by you there in that section. What is the basis for your edits? // Laughing Man 16:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ian Wallace (drummer)
Without wanting to revert to and fro, isn't reputable ("having a good reputation; "a reputable business"; "a reputable scientist"; "a reputable wine" [4]) more appropriate than reputed (commonly put forth or accepted as true on inconclusive grounds; "the foundling's putative father"; "the reputed (or purported) author of the book"; "the supposed date of birth" [5]) to describe Wallace's substantial and substantiated career as a session musician? AllyD 23:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- "Reputable" sounds very odd to me in this context (it feels as if it is contrast to "disreputable", which seems the wrong point to be making). "Reputed" can be a near synonym of "reputable" or "respectable"[6] and sounds better to me. Arguably, either word falls foul of Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words. The list of people with whom he worked speaks for itself, so I'm going to remove "reputed" and leave it bare, but feel free to change it as you wish. Bondegezou 10:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)