User talk:BMT
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I may be overstepping my bounds but I'd like to keep a tidy page so I will prune irrelevant messages. Old messages will be archived.
[edit] WP:AN
You should know that User:TheEditor20 has called you out over at AN. A Train take the 16:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Another thing: blanking or "pruning" your talk page is bad form. You should be archiving instead. Blank talk pages make it very difficult to help out with disputes like the one you're having over Ben Thompson. A Train take the 16:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll look into it. --BMT 16:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding reversions[1] made on February 10, 2007 to Ben Thompson
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 18:12, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] MPNA
I've edited through the text to remove the stuff that the references didn't back up, or was copied ad verbitim from the references. If you want to reintroduce that stuff, do, but either provide extra sources, or re-write so its not breaking copywrite. It looks like a perfectly good article now, though. --Robdurbar 22:00, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Good work on this article. --Robdurbar 11:04, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
