User talk:Bloodpack

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Archive
Archives

Contents

[edit] UBX

it really doesn't matter who created it. and I don't think there's much RESPECT to myself to go to every user's page, leave a message, watch the page, and in a year maybe possible move the UBXs (after someone else has already moved them). most people don't care, and if they do raise a stink, they need to read Wikipedia:Userbox migration. I'm telling you, leave a note on Jimbo Wales' talk page if you disagree with this policy, which I am putting to action. Scepia 02:48, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] request to unblock pls.

(unblock|as per my previous reason)

No change in the block setup on 202.175.214.146 (log/status). If you're blocked under a different IP address, or autoblocked, you'll need to let us know the relevant information. Please repost your request, including your IP address, the copy-pasted block reason, and the blocking admin. Thanks. Luna Santin 06:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
{{helpme}} doesn't work for unblock requests, because helpme respondents usually aren't admins (I'm not, for instance). In this situation, you could logging in via https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/ (which is a workaround which might bypass your proxy); you could also ask for the block on your IP to be softened (so you could edit from it whilst logged in; just adjust your unblock notice above). --ais523 11:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
i know its a shared IP (PROXY/ZOMBIE) im using right now, but is it possible to unblock this IP address ONLY if the user is properly logged in, or a user cannot edit via this IP if he/she is not logged in, or no one can register an account via this IP from now on and only established users who have already created an account via this IP can use wikipedia. the same User:Mangojuice did in my previous blocking. please reconsider as im an avid user of wikipedia. thanks! †Bloodpack† 09:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Done. Although you apparently were able to edit, because you left me a message. Mangojuicetalk 15:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] yeah.. um..

It's not my birthday. I wanted to join.... ---Lazylaces-Helping Wikipedians since.. um.. for almost a year! Lazylaces (talkcontribs 17:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] well, i updated it.

I thought it meant what day did you sign up. ---Lazylaces-Helping Wikipedians since.. um.. for almost a year! Lazylaces (talkcontribs 15:34, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Matt Fraction edit.

I hesitate to make the correction myself because I'm new to Wikipedia and I'm not sure what the proper format is, but the current edit of the Matt Fraction page reads as though Fraction was born in Kansas City; he was not. Should another pair of parentheses be added? What do you suggest? Kelly Sue 04:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Message from RVDDP2501

Hey Bloodpack, listen, I was wondering if I could ask your opinion on something regarding the Civil War comics page, would it be appropriate to edit the comics listing and make the list cronological as in the order the comics occur, let me know what you think - RVDDP2501 21:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, I hope we can sort this situation out soon - RVDDP2501 14:22, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Question/help from RVDDP2501

Hey Bloodpack, I'm sorry to bother you with this but I though you might be be best person to speak to on this concidering you seem to be more experienced with the working of wikipedia as well as comic books, last night, I created a page for an Image comics character from the Savage Dragon series called Horridus (comics), I have tried to make the page look to wikipedia's standards but my concern is that I obtained the information as well as the picture of the character form this site - http://webpages.marshall.edu/~wise11/botf/pages/characters/imageverse/heroes/horridus.html - I would appreciate your help on this matter, thank you - RVDDP2501 12:53, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Ok so just remove the stats for now, right? - RVDDP2501 16:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] thanks !

Thanks for the welcoming statement. As this is one of the hallmarks of wikipedie right? :) I did at least find out how you sign your name. Using the editing functions of wiki will have to be my next project yes? I have been contributing little snippets here and there since Oct last year. At least long enough not to be blocked from editing the Pluto page (have not as of yet as it is very well done) my favorite topic is the history of science and the history of spaceflight. As a member of AIAA and some other organizations and the occasional personal communications with JPL and NASA project scientists who are gracious enough to return emails.AIAA is very legalistic when it comes to there publications I am not sure how to use them as a reference for a wiki post? I would have to simply write down a publication and month and year. (AIAA astrodynamics conferences) --Infocat13 03:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Punisher

Will do. Hey, it's good hearing from you; I've liked seeing how you keep the Punisher entries in good shape and trim the fat.

You mentioned "Archie screenshot." I'm seeing the Archie/Punisher cover, which looks fine to me where it is, but I also notice an animated-series screenshot, which does indeed look awkward where it is. I'll move the screenshot, as I think you meant to suggest. Let me know if I'm misinterpreting. Anyway, good to hear from you, and I'm guessing it's about 11 a.m. in the Philippines! --Tenebrae 03:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] help

{helpme} as per the films naming convention i renamed the Blood Pack (Blade II) to Blood Pack (film), but it was reverted back and now i tried to rename it again but i accidentally made it to Blood Pack (filmI), can anyone fix this? thanks!

Okay I have fixed it. It did require an admin, but it was not much trouble.--Commander Keane 06:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Mmm yeah I have moved the article to Blood Pack (Blade II), that is the correct title (I thought it was a film, so Blood Pack (film) would have been correct - but I was mistaken). Thanks for pointing that out. Just as a side note, if you are writing about fiction you may find Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction) helpful.--Commander Keane 06:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bloodpack

Hallo, but that's exactly my point: Bloopack is not a film, nor is it a term generally used in films. Str1977 (smile back) 07:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

That's allright. Str1977 (smile back) 07:10, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thank you for catching me typing mistake.

-- Samuel Pakalomattam

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Medical transcriptionist.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Medical transcriptionist.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ed g2stalk 12:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Punisher external links

Why don't you like [1]? - Peregrine Fisher 17:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Comment

There's been a Request for Comment initiated at Talk:John Buscema#Request for Comment: NPOV and images, concerning a dispute over alleged violations and which includes links to two versions of an article, for comparison.

You're a regular and diligent contributor to WikiProject Comics, and so might be a knowledgeable and disinterested party who could add an informed opinion. --Tenebrae 17:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Age category

Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:

If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 12:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Bloodpack! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talkcontribsBot) 03:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hey

Could we get an IP lookup of User:James116 ? Think this is a vandalise only user. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lazylaces (talkcontribs).

[edit] Punisher

Hiya, Bloodpack. Haven't had a lot of time to stop by Wiki lately, but I'd be glad to swing over to the Punisher article after I've taken care of a few things. While I'm here I'd just like to say how much I've admired you work in keeping that article up to high encyclopedic standards. I wish all editors were as knowledgeable of the guidelines and as conscientious as you. --Tenebrae 14:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

You are too kind! I notice that Spider-Man 2099 has its own article, and since Punisher 2099 was in that original 1990s flight of titles and lasted for awhile, it'd certainly be consistent to have it be its own as well. I'm not familiar with the manga Punisher, I'm afraid. Thanks again for the nice words. Good editing back at you! --Tenebrae 03:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD discussion

List of Marvel Comics endearments has been nominated — unfortunately, I believe — for deletion. If you wouldn't mind taking a look at the article and adding a comment, pro or con, at its "Articles for Deletion" discussion, then the article can at least be assured of a fair and knowledgeable hearing by editors familiar with the context. Thanks --Tenebrae 05:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] catherine yronwode

Perhaps you thought the lack of capitalization was another example of the too common typo, but the author prefers the name not be capitalized, as is explained in the article. I therefore moved the article title back. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 19:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Talk: Civil War (comics)

Hi. Thanks for responding to me regarding the SHRA status list. Can you tell me which section on that archived page you linked to has that discussion and consensus? Thanks again. Nightscream 07:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge?`

How do I merge articles? LazyLaces 19:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)