User talk:Blake911

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

....

...

...

...

.

..

..

...

[edit] Shazbot85 harassment again

I'm here to ensure you realize that even if you delete the vandal warining, it is still in the page's history and can be referenced to show you have been warned. Best regards! Shazbot85^Talk 04:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Shazbot whatever you say doesn't matter because your in bed with Shadowclan and have a long history of harassing people on other websites. Try harassing someone else

Thanks Blake911 04:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Greetings again new user! I have warned you previously against personal attack and now I'm forced to look into some sort of administrative action against you. I'm sorry you have felt the need to personally attack me through the use of false acusations of harassment, especially considering I have politely warned you throughout your rude treatment of me. I hope that the forthcomming intervention will prove helpful for your future Wikipedian tenure. Best regards! Shazbot85^Talk 04:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Your under my talk and discussion and your posting a violation about me to benefit your personal interest for a guild you belong to named shadowclan The only person harassing and making personal attacks is you. Your giving me unfair warnings and you are unfit to edit the discussion with more violations since your obviously doing this to benefit yourself and shadowclan

Blake911 06:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks and removing warnings

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. You also need to be aware that it is generally considered unacceptable to keep removing various warnings from your talk page and can lead to you inability to edit your own talk page. Shell ^babelfish 04:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank god someone actually warned Shazbot85 for harassment for once. Thank you Kinney, for not letting me be bombarded by people in an online gaming guild. Blake911 06:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Blake, please reality is not rubber! The warning goes to YOU. (or else it would have been added to Shinzbots talk page.--Jestix 06:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm confused because he clearly has an agenda to benefit himself and shadowclan. Jestix unless your friends with Shazbot or a member of Shadowclan as well why can't you notice this as well and do something about it? Your great at editing articles with notablitiy but you can't stop Shazbot from giving me warnings to benefit himself? Please be fair and honest and give Shazbot a warning.

Blake911 06:23, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

The warnings are based on factual edits you have made that merited them. Disagreeing with you is not harassment, thus I am blameless as that's all that's occured. That and civily reminding you of what you ought to do. Regards, Shazbot85^Talk 06:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

No one has warned me for harassment, you are the only one who has committed harrassment and vandalism. It would be in your best interest to cease and dissist as we have repeatedly warned. It eems your axe to grind situation is warping your thought processes. Best Regards, Shazbot85^Talk 06:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Well I can accept warnings from you since you have an agenda to benefit yourself and shadowclan. Your also known for harassing other people on other gaming website. Again if your trying to be fair Jestix, please direct yourself to www.shadowclan.com/darkmoot there you will find a wikipedia article about shadowclan trashing Bloodclan and rallying support to prevent their guild from being deleted from wikipedia. You can also direct yourself to www.bloodclanorcs.com/forum where they are discussing similar topics. The point is Shazbot belongs to clan Shadowclan and I am a member of Bloodclan. These two online guilds dislike one another and Shazbot is exploiting the wikipedia moderater system to benefit himself and shadowclan.

Shazbot you don't have to continue to respond because you can't take a fair and balanced judgement seeing how your a member of Shadowclan.

Blake911 06:31, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

The only one who has illustrated dislike for the other is you for Shadowclan. I have made no omission of affiliation with Shadowclan. I see you further wish to engage in personal attack, I have no choice but to alert the administrators. I hope you learn the error of your ways and return better for it. Best wishes, Shazbot85^Talk 06:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

• Blake I'm not interested in your clan fights, neither yours nor Shinzbots, nor what the clans do or how good/bad leadership is. Honestly, I personally would never join any clan. I only care about the "contributions" on wikipedia. I see only you "contributing" to wikipedia except a few small valid edits to existings articles mostly in your very own interests (RPLink, Clan, Website, Family, Yourself). Now you are deleting history on your very own talk page.
• Shinzbot would e.g. not even be here, if you didn't attract him yourself by bluntly adding you RPLink spam to the Shadowclan page. Please note the last warning to you you see above was not done by Shinzbot or me, it was already by an Wikipedia Admin!
• Maybe you are a great guy, but please show by behaving properly! Wikipedia welcomes you as long you dont raise more cleanup work to other editors than the contributions by you. --Jestix

Shazbot now your lieing you already stated you couldn't comment on a page because you were in shadowclan. The Family documents is very notable and I will work hard to resubmit them due to the fact their is many famous people. If a Street fighter named Kimo can not be deleted from wikipedia. Then I don't see why someone who was the president of Georgia Tech, founder of organizations, frats, and a person who is studied in text books can't be on here.

I have noticed that this is really a game. Maybe not to you Jestix, but people like Shazbot and yes members of silly online clans cloud your statements and warnings. This appears to be a website that anyone can log on and edit, delete, alter or add false information posted by other people. Sometimes it can be helpful.... but I only use it as a last resort because you can post completely false information here......sure it will probably be editted and corrected, but not immediately. In some cases important or notable information is even editted or deleted. --Blake911 06:46, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Blake, maybe you should hit the "Dislaimers" link in the lower-left portion of the page you view right now: Here is it again Wikipedia:General_disclaimer. --Jestix 06:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Also, yes nobody guarantes the information to be right, as any vandal can destroy it, however the greater community watches it. However most of the information you will find is correct. On the other hand, nobody can guarante you when walking on the street some bad tempered person forces a knife into you back, and it happens in a few cases, most times you can count on not having to fear from this. --Jestix 07:15, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

• Blake - let me make it clear that the above warning was in reference to you, as is every other message you receive on this page. Since you have continued to harass other users and personally attack them despite warnings far in excess of what is normally given, I have no choice but to block you for a period of time. Please read our policies that are linked in the welcome message you received above.

Several editors have tried to explain that you are not being harassed over the articles you have created. Unfortunately, they don't appear to meet our criteria for inclusion. For articles about real people, the guidelines are at WP:BIO - if you can provide references that your article meets those guidelines, please do so. For articles about websites, the guidlines are at WP:WEB. Shell ^babelfish 11:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your question in the AfD

I am not a moderator or administrator on Wikipedia, just a friendly user looking out for you and everyone else. Best regards, Shazbot85^Talk 15:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Blake911 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Shazbot85^Talk 00:50, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Second sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Blake911 (2nd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Simões (^talk/_contribs) 01:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Third sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Blake911 (3rd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

Simões (talk/contribs) 02:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)