User talk:Blair Bonnett
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Blair_Bonnett. |
Feel free to leave any comments, constructive criticism etc. here and I will reply here. If you are commenting on an article I have created / edited, please include a link to it.
If I have commented on your talk page, please respond there as I will be watching it, and that way the discussion is kept in one place.
Contents |
[edit] Wikipedia:Sandbox/Wikistory (Sentence)
Why not try the above? Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 12:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- Don't mind if I do. Blair - Speak to me 04:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Van_der_Pauw_Method_-_Hall_Effect.png
I believe your drawing used to demostrate the Hall Effect is incorrect in two points assuming the current flow is the same direction in each of the four parts. The link is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Van_der_Pauw_Method_-_Hall_Effect.png. Since the electrons are negatively charged, the Lorentz force (qv x B) will actually push the electrons to the other side of the sample than you have drawn in (c) since q = -e (again assuming the current is still out of the screen)! In part (d) where there is an electric field, electrons will always move opposite to the direction of the field lines (again due to q = -e). I am sorry if I have used this page incorrectly, but I am not sure how else to enter a comment.
AJT (Trionfia, 14:05, 13 December 2006)
- That's OK. I moved the comment into a new section - in future, the best way to enter a new comment is to click the '+' link next to the 'edit this page' link. This will start a new section for the comment. Also, please enter an edit summary (a quick description of your changes) in the box below the main edit box.
- As for the image, I think you are correct. Using the right-hand rule, the electrons are moving out of the page (part (b)), the field is upwards, so a positive charge would move to the left ==> negative charge would move to the right. Sounds convincing to me - I'll change the image later this evening. Well spotted and thanks for pointing it out.
- Blair - Speak to me 05:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Changed. Blair - Speak to me 08:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I need some help..
Where do I put the scripts? I saw the one you made and I would like to use it. Lego1496 10:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Its not quite finished yet, but give me 24 hours or so and I'll post some instructions. Blair - Speak to me 10:48, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism?
What are you talking about, Vandalism to the Universal Sufism article??? I have created most of the article!! - User:Djalo24 18:25, 1 January 2007
- I'm really really sorry about that. I didn't check the history thoroughly enough and by the time I realised you'd started re-adding so I couldn't undo my revert. Seems I wasn't having a good night last night. Please accept my humblest apologies. Blair - Speak to me 23:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Sieg Heil Vandalism
This addition was NOT vandalism. It is well known that the New Zealand mongrel mob spell the phrase with a different spelling. The greeting part was also correct. Many people; who may or not be within your circle of friends, use this greeting. I have reversed your changes to the page. If you have any queries, please reply to this message on my talk page.
George Williams
Department of Criminology, Law and Society
Victoria University
Wellington
New Zealand
Template:Subatomicguy
