User talk:Bittergrey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Bittergrey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Here are a few more good links for to help you get started:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 00:55, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] All up to you now
Time to add references to your article. You should work quickly though as it isn't a long term lock down. --OrbitOne 06:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] KAS et alii
Very breifly: I'm looking it over, and I've roped in someone else to look it over. So for the short term I'd suggest just looking away. In fact, everyone involved should just find something else to do for a day or two. I'm more tortoise than hare, be warned.
brenneman {L} 03:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hi. I'll be looking into this dispute during Aaron's (uneventful, I'm sure) absence. Please note my comment on KAS' talk page and feel free to pursue the matter in those terms. I am protecting the article, for now (on her version, simply as it is the latest one). Also: If someone is threatening you, or stalking you and you fear physical harm, contact law enforcement in your area, we are not the police. Regards, El_C 08:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Please keep your cool in this matter. If there is a dispute which originates outside of Wikipedia then let's not drag it in here. To the extent possible it's best if we pretned we dont' know anyone here, and simply focus on the editing. Feel free to contact me or another admin to help work through tht problems. -Will Beback 08:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Trust
[Removed to avoid threatened actions BitterGrey 15:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)][Removed to avoid threatened actions BitterGrey 15:11, 22 June 2006 (UTC)]
- That only appears to be a first name, so while it might be inappropriately personal, it isn't particularly identifiable, there are millions who go by that name. Whereas you have actually revealed personal information of hers, which is grounds for an indefinite suspension. And that dorsey link is unrelated to anything (Wikipedia-wise), so why are you even mentioning it? Where exactly is the evidence that she attempted to reveal your personal details, anywhere? You must cease immediately from using terms such as "blackmail" here. If you have confidential evidence (i.e. emails, including headers) you may send these to myself/Will/Aaron via email. El_C 08:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- [Removed to avoid threatened actions BitterGrey 15:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)]
[edit] Brevity
I know that I can be uncontrollably prolix at times, but enough is sometime too much. Can you put more links and diffs and less prose? Have a look at this and see how much information is crammed into a small space. In particular, contrast with the bit that evaded refactoring. The more tightly you can present the argument, the more likely you are to be heard.
brenneman {L} 09:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I'll try to boil it down to the sentence below...BitterGrey 18:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Personal Information
[Removed to avoid threatened actions BitterGrey 15:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)]
[edit] Starting a new
Having read your five emails [I did not respond, even though much of it could not be verified to my satisfaction — note: I do not seek its verification], the summaries above, and the content in (including videos) in all the links, and I have reached my decision, which I'm confident the other admins will concur with: both of you are hereby prohibited from making any personal comments toward, or about, each other. You are to treat each other, as identified by Wikipedia usernames, as purely intellectual entities, entirely detached and removed from your person and personal histories (real or otherwise), and the particularities of your psyches [there's a biref article(!)]. Any deviation from this rule will be met by immediate sanctions. Please contact myself or another admin if you feel one side has breached this condition. You are free to pursue any dispute resolution steps you see fit with respect to the content dispute, but these must involve it and it alone, in those (above) terms. In the regretful event this dispute (those components which are not purely intellectual) continues outside of Wikipedia, it and its details are to remain outside of it. What you do with it there is your legal and otherwise prerogative, though I advise against such interaction and plead with both of you to treat each other in a kind and considerate way from now on. I await Aaron's findings regarding the underlying content dispute following his review of the scholarship. Thanks in advance, El_C 23:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- I concur with El_C. -Will Beback 23:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- [Removed to avoid threatened actions BitterGrey 15:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)]
- There is but it's a bit of work, so I'm inclined against it, since it isn't your first name, anyway. I don't see what harm it poses. El_C 01:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- [Removed to avoid threatened actions BitterGrey 15:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)]