Talk:Bishop Seabury Academy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Kansas, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Kansas-related articles to a feature-quality standard.

Avaknerd, please be careful to keep your own edits to the page un-opinionated (and use correct grammar). Your new addition to the issues section seemed to be one of anger directed at the school for their recent edits as opposed to a factual statement about the edits. That being said, the schools behavior on this article has been bad as well, but I think that has been stopped now. I have moved the issues section back to the bottom of the article, where it was originally placed. Larzia 17:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Larzia (I know who you are), to everyone who loves the academy, I am sorry. This has to be done. I am getting sick and tired of seeing IPs coming from the Academy exercising behavior that is almost similar to that of Propaganda. I have seen uses of double speak and deletion of articles which almost translates to censorship itself.

I will remind everyone that Wikipedia is NOT AN ADVERTISEMENT BOARD. I will make it clear that I will not have this article for deletion, but I will express regret that this is happening. This is irresponsible of the school itself and if they are not willing to admit their negatives, then shame on them. The more editing out of the negatives I see, the more I will drive a knife through the schools reputation. I haven't exposed all of the negatives of the school and I certainly will not hesitate to expose more if this continues.

Congratulations! You, my friends at Seabury, have discovered the secrets of double speak. The issues that go around in the school are certainly not "opinion and comment" and have evidence that can back them up.

Larzia, thank you for being such a great help. I do not want to see this article deleted, but I do not also want this article to just solely advertise the school as well. Nothing is ever perfect- but the fact that several people are trying to cover up these faults disturbs me greatly. This is highly unprofessional.

I apologize and express regret at the same time that I had to do this. The school must understand their limitations on what they can and cannot do outside of the school grounds. I will think of this as a punishment for the academy, but I will also remove the recent additions to the Issues section if I see that other people have not been tampering with this article. Larzia, if you wish to move the Issues section to the lowest part of the article, I will not mind at all.

Avaknerd50

I'm not sure who deleted capital campaign information, but I believe that legitimately falls under the history section. I restored it back to the form I wrote it in.

Larzia 05:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

24.124.34.1 is the IP address of the school. I have sent an e-mail to the secretary asking that people not remove the issues section or the whole article will be deleted. As the creator of this article and an alum of the school, I'd be disappointed to see it deleted. I will restore the issues section (my re-written version, which I believe preserves the facts) as soon as I finish typing this.

Larzia 04:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I will keep this article non biased. No matter how many times 24.124.34.1 modifies this page. Every time I see an unfair edit by this IP address- I will restore the article to its original state. If you can't handle negative facts being placed up here- I will have this article in consideration for a deletion. Wikipedia is not an advertisement board. You should not remove negative facts that are true.

Avaknerd50