Talk:Bionicle: Mask of Light

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bionicle: Mask of Light article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

Article policies
The Bionicle: Mask of Light article is part of WikiProject Lego, an attempt to expand, update, and improve all articles relating to Lego on Wikipedia. You may edit this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives for the project.
Good article GA
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Mid
This article has been rated as Mid-Importance on the importance scale.
This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Mid
This article has been rated as Mid-Importance on the importance scale.
Good articles Bionicle: Mask of Light (reviewed version) has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do.
If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.
To-do list for Bionicle: Mask of Light: edit  · history  · watch  · refresh
  • I think it has the makings of a good article, as it has a good use of inline citations and a decent structure, but I found it unbalanced and not comprehensive.
  • copyediting for style ("he's too much of a wimp" for example, doesn't have a very encylopedic tone).
  • The plot section is far too long - it should be a summary, not a blow-by-blow account of every scene.
  • It needs a section on the characters. This is currently interwoven with the plot section and makes it difficult to read as well as increasing its length still further
  • The production section covers immediate pre-production only. It needs information on earlier pre-production, production and post-production.
  • I assume the film is CG animation, but the only clue is in the accompanying images.
  • Some of the information is disconnected, assuming a familiarity with the subject:For the design, Shakespeare noted that "The first film had primary colors that were coded to the areas and a younger feel.". Coded to the areas? What does that mean?
Peer review Bionicle: Mask of Light has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.


[edit] Errors

  • Kopaka Nuva throws his ice blade to knock the Rahkshi into the water. But then he magically has it again when he freezes the water.
    • He actually has two separate blades.
  • The first reference claims that the movie has sold 40 million copies.
    • The cited reference actually says 40 million people have bought Bionicle products, giving no figure for the movie (it was written just 6 days after the release.)

[edit] This is a Good Article

After review, I've determined this article to meet the qualifications for Good Article status. It is well referenced, and is written with a good "out of universe" perspective.

A few notes for further progress:

  • Keep a close eye on the "in universe" perspective sections, namely, the plot summary. Read Writing about fiction for tips. These sections should be kept concise, and relevance to the 'real world' should be noted wherever possible.
  • Keep an eye on international issues. Currency should be marked as US$500, instead of just with a $ sign, since this is an international encyclopedia. Likewise, release locations should give enough information for someone anywhere on earth to understand what happened. I'll try to take care of a few of these little issues in a quick copyedit.
  • Limit the use of fair-use images. I know that, for movies, there aren't many opportunities for non-fair-use images, but keep their use topical, and limited. No picture should be in the article without being next to a relevant paragraph. I think things are OK right now, but the article probably shouldn't have any more fair-use images unless there is a very compelling reason.

Keep up the good work. Please leave a message on my talk page if you would like clarification on my decision. Phidauex 16:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC)