Talk:Bioelectromagnetics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ] | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. | |
|
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
||
Hi, I'm trying to get this page off the ground, and would appreciate any help in doing so. Remember to be bold (since I'm not)!
Some things I'm looking for:
1. A good reference for the FDA approval of using pulsed magnetic fields for noninvasive treatment of nonunion bone fractures. I've seen it casually referenced in a large number of publications, but have never seen something to cite. I don't even know if the FDA puts out something to cite.
2. A discussion of the science of bioelectromagnetics. It is an active research area currently, with at least one journal published by Wiley devoted to it. However, there is some amount of stigma associated with the field since it does not have the theoretical framework of harder sciences (though studies must still have testable, falsifiable hypotheses, etc.). Many other non-scientific fields or applications use words like bioelectromagnetism or bioenergy, which may cause confusion. See, for example, the article at Bioelectromagnetic.
3. A history of some sorts. The bioelectromagnetics society published a history not too long ago, but I don't know how much of it covers the society versus the field of study. Also, for obvious reasons, we can't copy too much from it.
4. Perhaps a section in particular on the research into non-thermal effects of electromagnetic fields, which may have bearings on set exposure limits.
5. Anything else that belongs here, including links to other pages, as well as links back here.
Potatophysics 10:45, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] great idea
Hi Potatophysics, just checking in from a bit of a wikivacation. I would love to help with this. I do have a large number of references on this, unfortunatelty the subject as a whole is not adequately handled anywhere that I know of. Let me start with a bit of a overview or possible table of contents or whatever you want to call it, and a few sources. Edit at will ;) ObsidianOrder 12:25, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the help, the references especially should go a long way while this page gets off the ground. The table of contents looked pretty daunting at first, but the structure seems very logical, and it should make researching & writing in small stages easier. Potatophysics 02:52, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] bioelectromagnetics vs bioelectromagnetism
The bioelectromagnetism article is a possible merge candidate. It refers to the intrinsic electomagnetic fields produced by living organisms, which could be handled in a section here. Since we are talking about the effects of fields, including intrinsic fields (possibly quite important as a mechanism for passing information within the organism), the nature and sources of those fields are a closely related subject and really should be dealt with in the same place for a more unified treatment. In any case, because of the similarity of the names we should either have clear definitions and/or merge. ObsidianOrder 18:01, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Deleted a bunch of categories
Well, they looked horrible. I know I'm certainly turned off by a trillion categories with absolutely nothing on them. Besides, it's been like that since like forever. Here are the categories I deleted:
Effects of artificial fields Powerlines CRTs Cell phones Radar Other transmitters (radio, TV, ...) Medical applications Bone fracture healing Low-level Laser Therapy (LLLT) Strong magnetic pulses for disinfection Other Noise-masking, time and space integration, cooperativity Intrinsic fields Natural fields Primary interaction mechanisms Membrane polarization Electrorotation Ion cyclotron resonance (and ion parametric resonance) Nonlinear kinetics Frohlich-style macro dipole interactions DNA conduction Microtubule waveguides Ferromagnetic domains Frequency selectivity from spatial features Effects on the level of a cell or below Calcium efflux Neurotransmitter systems DNA strand breaks and genotoxicity Ornithine decarboxylase Melatonin Bacterial growth and metabolism Effects on the level of an organ or system Blood-brain barrier permittivity EEG changes Wound healing, regeneration and bone growth Cancer promotion Whole-organism effects Electrical sensing organs (fish, etc) Navigation (bees, pidgeons, etc) Effects on embryonic development
Now, I don't know what half of this is for. Melatonin? what about it? microtubule waveguides? huh? Oh yeah, forgot to sign my name --TheAlphaWolf 17:17, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Ok, agreed, they looked bad. If I had a lot more time I'd fill them in (and probably publish a goddamn monograph too), however they are a good outline for what the article should contain, organized nicely into topics and sub-topics. If you look up any of these plus "electromagnetic" in MEDLINE or any other good citation database you will get a large number of interesting articles, the problem is writing a coherent summary suitable for an encyclopedia. For example, decreased melatonin levels are one of the classic (suspected) effects of exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields, and could be a key mechanism in cancer promotion, see Reiter RJ, "Melatonin suppression by static and extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields: relationship to the reported increased incidence of cancer.", Rev Environ Health. 1994 Jul-Dec;10(3-4):171-86 [1]. A MEDLINE search for "melatonin AND magnetic" brings up 378 articles - of which probably a third say there is no effect, and the other two thirds describe everything in between a very weak and a very strong effect. Now, you write a summary for that section ;) The situation is much the same for all the rest of them. Microtubule waveguides - see Stuart Hameroff's work on Orch-OR theory - I believe he proposed the idea as part of that, and this would be a primary interaction mechanism that works somewhere in the >10GHz range. Anything else? ObsidianOrder 00:29, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's why I posted them here after I deleted them- they are a good outline for what should be in the article. However, as the lenght of time they've been there without being expanded shows, most people that come and read the article don't know what half of them mean, and the ones that do apparently don't expand the article for whatever reason. I don't know how many people read the article anyway, because people (I know I don't) don't generally trust articles that look bad. If they look neat and organized, people are more likely to read the article and maybe even contribute to it. Deleting all the categories with nothing on them makes people want to read the article more and contribute. If you want to expand certain cagegories then great, you can look them up here or in the history. Having empty categories only encourages contributions if there are only one or two of them. --TheAlphaWolf 00:51, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
