Biopolitics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A neologism coined by Michel Foucault, the term "biopolitics" or "biopolitical" can refer to several different yet not incompatible concepts.

[edit] Definitions

1. In the work of Michel Foucault, the style of government that regulates populations through biopower (the application and impact of political power on all aspects of life).
2. The political application of bioethics.
3. A political spectrum that reflects positions towards emerging technologies upon the techno-progressive/bioconservative axis.
4. Political advocacy in support of, or in opposition to, reproductive technology and genetic engineering.
5. Public policies regarding reproductive technology and genetic engineering.
6. Political advocacy concerned with the welfare of all forms of life.
7. In the works of Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, anti-capitalist insurrection using life and the body as weapons; examples include flight from poverty and, 'in its most tragic and revolting form', suicide terrorism.^[1]

[edit] Politics and the life sciences

As a field of the academic discipline of political science, biopolitics is also known as "politics and the life sciences". The Association for Politics and the Life Sciences was formed in 1981 and exists to study the field of biopolitics as a subfield of political science. APLS owns and publishes an academic peer-reviewed journal called Politics and the Life Sciences (PLS). The journal is edited in the United States at the University of Maryland, College Park’s School of Public Policy, in Maryland.

The Department of Political Science at Northern Illinois University offers undergraduate and graduate courses in the field of politics and the life sciences. It is the only political science department in the U.S. to offer politics and the life sciences as a graduate field of study.

[edit] Notes

1. ^ Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri (2005). Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. Hamish Hamilton.