Bill B. Burnett
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Most Rev. Bill Bendyshe Burnett, (born 1917 -- died August 23, 1994 in Grahamstown, South Africa) grew up speaking Afrikaans, as well as English, at a time when racial discrimination was growing toward Apartheid. Archbishop Burnett called racial segregation morally indefensible.[1] After retiring as Archbishop, Bill Burnett became the center around which the South African Charismatic Movement was wound.
Contents |
[edit] Family Life
Bill Burnett married Sheila Fulton Trollip at the end of WWII when he was 28-years-old. Together, they raised a family of two sons and a daughter, while traveling with his Anglican Church assignments. He served as Bishop in Bloemfontein for 9 years and later as Bishop of Grahamstown for 5 years. He and his family lived in Capetown for 7 years when he was the concurrently Archbishop of Cape Town and South-West Africa, Lesotho, Swaziland and Mozambique.
- Bishop of Bloemfontein 1957 -1966
- South African Council of Churches 1966 - 1969(see note)
- Bishop of Grahamstown 1969 - 1974
- Archbishop and Metropolitan Church of the Province 1974 - 1981
Note: This was immeasurably strengthened when Robert Selby Taylor, as bishop of Grahamstown and subsequently as archbishop, was instrumental in encouraging Bishop Bill Burnett to take on the position of General Secretary at the SACC (South African Council of Churches) in 1967. [2]
[edit] Apartheid
The English Speaking Churches in South Africa were the focus of a strong opposition to Apartheid during the 1960s and 1970s, though they did not move from protest to resistance as a whole. In the 1960s, there was a movement to create groups within the Christian church which would stand up for the rights of those oppressed. Groups which would be focal points of Christian resistance. Unfortunately, there was opposition within the Christian community in South Africa, wherein the Dutch Reformed Churches attacked this new approach as though it were a new denomination. The Dutch Reformed Church had traditionally been closely connected to the government in power, the Nationalist Party. Bishop Burnett, at that time, the General Secretary of the South African Council of Churches, said at a Synod meeting in Grahamstown, that because of his position he could not lead such a movement, but if nobody else tried to get it going, he might consider doing so.
However, in 1979, Bill Burnett was the Anglican Archbishop of Cape Town and thus president of the Anglican Provincial Synod and once again, he voiced a challenge to the Synod.
There was a rather long and waffling motion being debated by the Synod about the permits that the government required the church to apply for. Bill Burnett spoke from the chair, saying that he disliked having to apply for permits, but he thought it was part of his role in keeping the institutional church going. He was quite prepared to see the institutional church die, and if that was what synod really wanted him to do, he would do it. It was a challenge to the synod to "think sect", based on the same kind of thinking as in the earlier "Obedience to God" movement. It was a challenge to the synod to move beyond passing resolutions, and to actually act on its principles. The synod failed to meet the challenge, and Bill Burnett retired before the next one met.
The press picked it up, and if the synod had not resolved to play it safe, it might have been a very different story. There was no resolution to this effect that was minuted. Burnett's direct challenge was met by embarrassed silence and evasion; and at that moment the synod, black members as well as white, showed itself to be indeed trapped in apartheid. Burnett had opened to door a chink, but the church did not want to escape from the trap.[3]
While the Vatican seeks to rid Catholicism of any colonial taint in Portuguese Africa, the liberal Protestant South African Council of Churches has taken a bold stand against racism in its own country. At a recent national conference, council delegates passed a strong resolution warning that racial tension in South Africa is leading to "violence and war." And if it came to this, the council added, Christians should seriously question whether they could participate in armed battle against liberation forces. The resolution reasoned that both "Catholic and Reformation theology" teach that Christians can only participate in a just war—and the requirements for a just war rule out fighting for "a basically unjust and discriminatory society." That, said the council, is a fair description of South Africa. The resolution noted that South Africa's Dutch-descended Afrikaners themselves cited British repression as the rationale for the Boer War against Britain and argued that "the same applies to the black people in their struggle today." The resolution has been condemned in the South African Parliament and by the Dutch Reformed churches, which do not belong to the council. But the new Anglican Archbishop of Cape Town, the Rt. Rev. Bill B. Burnett, last week defended it. Said he: "It faces us with things as they are."[4]
[edit] Teachings
A classic example of this sickness was in evidence again only "yesterday" The Anglican synod was in session in Grahamstown. The Most. Rev. Bill Burnett, the Archbishop was preaching to his flock. He created a confusion in his Anglican community. An erudite Englishman, addressing a group of learned English priests and bishops, in their own mother-tongue — English, which his learned colleagues drastically misunderstood: to such an extent that Mr. McMillan, perhaps also an Anglican, the Editor of an English daily — "The Natal Mercury" dated December 11, 1979, had this to say about the confusion the Archbishop had created among his own learned clergy:
"ARCHBISHOP BURNETTS REMARKS AT THE SYNOD WERE HARDLY A MODEL OF CLARITY AND WERE WIDELY AND DRAMATICALLY MISINTERPRETED BY MANY OF THOSE PRESENT." [5]
| Preceded by Gordon Leslie Tindall |
Anglican Bishop of Grahamstown 1969-1974 |
Succeeded by Kenneth Cyril Oram |
