User talk:Bigdottawa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

no.

[edit] 219 Days

Hi. Our policies regarding verifiable sources and reliable sources should explain why these tags are appropriate. Think of it this way. There is nothing to stop me from creating a website that tells all about what a wonderful muscian I am (I'm not), and then creating an article based entirely on my totally bogus website. Of course, that would hardly be appropriate, and so we have policies against that sort of thing. When we find articles that have no sources or are self-sourced, we tag them in hopes that an interested editor may come along some time and add reliable, neutral references to the article. Such is the case with 219 Days.

Please also note that we have policies on regarding civility, and violating those may result in your account being blocked. If you care about the artist and/or album in question, just add a few reliable sources to the article, perhaps expand on the article a bit (the fact that it exists hardly makes it article-worthy), and the article will look much nicer. This assumes, of course, that you actually care about the article, though by all appearances, you do. Rklawton 19:54, 3 March 2007 (UTC)