User talk:Big Boss 0/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Creator of Light Horus

The tournament for the Horakit that you have took place on July 24, 2005 in Tokyo Japan. That other guy is full of crap. However I should inform you that I have the what you refered to as the ATK Horakit. The tournament took place for that one on January 14, 2006 at the same location. Please respond to my edit as soon as possible! I just have one question, how did you get this card. I heard that the previous owner died in a car accident or something? User: Nightmare 81

Yes he did die in a car accident. I got the card from Jake's younger brother. And please answer my question. Did a girl win three of the tournaments and what Horus cards did she win? User: Big Boss 0

You mean Jake Stilskon?! Man I didn't know that he was dead! Anyway yes a girl did win three of the Horakit tournaments. So far there have been 22 Horakit's awarded as prized at the ten tournaments. They started on July 24, 2005 and ended August 19, 2006. As for what Horakit cards that she won would be what you defined as the Counterstrike, Divine Light, and Swiftkill Horakit cards. User: Nightmare 81

Spelling errors aside thanks for the information. However could you by chance give me her name and a breif description of her. I want to know a little more about this person. And by chance could you give me the new web site of the tournament winners. The old one appears to be down. User: Big Boss 0

The name and adress that she gave was completely fake. As far as a description she is about 5ft 6in tall with dark hair. I'm sorry but I know almost nothing about her too. As far as the web site I have no idea why it is down but I will try to set up a new one. By chance how do you upload images on this site? User: Nightmare 81

Your spelling leaves a lot to be desired, but thanks for the information. About the images ask Moe. He is a recipient of the Big Boss Award just like you so he should be no problem finding him! Have you by chance checked out my user page. I suggest you do but you need to slow down a little bit when typing. And isn't the japanese name of the cards Horakti? User: Big Boss 0

You need to capitalize man however thanks for the information. That is about all of the information that I have right now. I will try to build a new web page as soon as possible. User: Nightmare 81

I have a question for you. Why did you help me out against that guy? There for a while I was beginning to believe him. The you came along... Why tell me he was wrong? And by the way do you know if she kept any of the Horus cards that she won. User: Big Boss 0

I helped you out because he by saying that that wasn't the tournament prize Horakti would take away from my prestige of winning the tournament. It was single elimination and I barely won. I couldn't stand by while someone tried to destroy what I worked so hard to acomplish. I then created an account and went offensive. As far as if she kept any of them HOW THE HELL SHOULD I KNOW!!!!!!!!! User: Nightmare 81

Thank you for answering my question. And please try to spell correctly from now on. User: Big Boss 0

Last Statement to Big Boss 0: I did not know for sure if he was dead. That is why I asked if he had died because I heard that he died. I wasn't 100% shure. Anyway thanks for the help you have given me and I will see you around again someday. User: Nightmare 81

Please be aware that adding this template to your user page does not semi-protect it. If you need semi-protection, contact an administrator. semper fi — Moe 21:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Please see WP:RFPP and request it there. I can help there if you like, but I think you can figure it out. If you can't, I'm willing to help :) semper fi — Moe 22:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Looks great :) But I don't know if there is enough vandalism to your userpage to constitute semi-protection right now. I wouldn't worry about it right now :) semper fi — Moe 22:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Ok ;) semper fi — Moe 22:59, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

re:Congratulations

Oh, thank you very much in honoring me, it's nice to hear positive feedback once and a while :) semper fi — Moe 23:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Big Boss Award

Do you want me to make a Big Boss Award template so you can give it to the user when you Congratulate them?--Pediaguy16 03:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Ok here it is.--Pediaguy16 03:46, 1 December 2006 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Big_Boss_Award

Oh just put these {{}} around Big Boss Award

This user has been recognized as a
Big Boss Award recipient.

or a more simplier way to explain it is type this:

{{Big Boss Award}}

This will produce the above template :) semper fi — Moe 21:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Voodoo Kin Mafia Suck

This section of my discussion page is to discuss how much these two idiots stink up the place at TNA. Take them off the air please! Why even hire these guys? This section is devoted to every D-Generation X fan out there.

These guys are such idiots! Triple H is injured so they lost all of their heat to fight D-Generation X. They never expected him to get injured. I am upset about HHH's injury but still these idiot's plan has backfired. Whatcha gonna do brother when DX steamrolls you! Big Boss 0 14:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Sure

Sure I'll look into it. What pages should I investigate? -- T H L R 04:07, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Moe Epsilon, he got frustrated. Many users grow frustrated with the way Wikipedia works. Hopefully this will just be a Wikibreak. Cheers, -- T H L R 04:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not used to seeing an index on user pages. I'll do my best to take care of those sock puppets. Cheers, -- T H L R 04:21, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

As far as the southpark one goes, just wait for him to vandalize again. After that, report it to the AIV board as a vandalism only account (assuming that he keeps up with nothing but vandalism), and it will get indef blocked. If you want to prove that it is a sock, you'll have to let it stick around for a little while. That way the pattern of vandalism will become apparent. After that, request a checkuser. One John Cena vandalism isn't enough to request a checkuser. If it comes out positive, then the IP would be blocked as well. That would be the main advantage to letting it stick around. Sadly, IPs can't be indef blocked, but they can receive incredibly long blocks. If you could tell me the main pattern that would be great. I know that they tend to linger around the John Cena page, but if their is more I will need to know. Cheers, -- T H L R 04:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the award, and you're welcome. -- T H L R 04:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Hybrid if you see this someone called User: The King of Koopas Reborn: Bowser Koopa has attacked my discussion page and my user page! What the heck is going on here? Could you please help me out of this situation. What should I do?!

He's taken care of, though I didn't do it. Cheers, -- T H L R 21:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 209.175.175.155 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: —Pilotguy (push to talk) 21:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Triple Crown Champions, at the moment I don't have a list like that, sorry. Another WP:PW fan has contacted the WWE, so there may be a list posted on wwe.com within a couple months. As far as the sock announcing who he was going to attack, he just wants recognition. He wants us to worry. It is an intimidation tactic. Of course, what can he really do? Even the infamous Willy on Wheels didn't do anything that lasted. After a couple months, everything will be lost in page histories, and no one will remember Bowser Koopa. He may pop up now and again after IP blocks expire, but after about 2 edits he will be gone for another year. This is just another worthless, generic puppet vandal. Nothing to be worried about. -- T H L R 02:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Willy on Wheels is the most infamous vandal in Wikipedia history. If he wasn't the first, he was the most effective page move vandal ever. He would move large numbers of pages to (Article Name) ON WHEELS! For a while he could move 50 pages in this way before anyone knew he had returned and block his current account, and all of those pages would have to be moved back by hand. In a strange way, he actually helped Wikipedia in the long run. Bots were developed that rendered him useless compared to what he was capable of before. He might move 3 pages before a bot would revert his edits and notify an admin who would block him. Bots like AntiVandalBot are his uncanny legacy. He quit about a year ago, and since then there have been many imitators and people who have tried in vain to make a name for themselves in the same way he did. Bowser Koopa is just another person who will have their name lost in page histories trying to be remembered. -- T H L R 02:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

After WP:DENY came into effect, his contributions were deleted. There are two accounts disputed to be the originals; User:Willy on Wheels and User:WoW. There are countless socks such as Willy on Round Objects, SpongeWilly SquareWheels, ect. -- T H L R 02:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

I warned him about the vandalism and the personal attacks. Please notify me if he continues with either of them. Cheers, -- T H L R 21:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

It has already been added to the list of suspected socks. If a formal user check isn't performed, then an account can't be added to a list of confirmed socks. In this case, a formal check wasn't done because it wasn't needed to block him. Cheers, -- T H L R 22:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Because you are a good editor who is taking the initiative to stop vandalism. The same people that have been vandalizing you have been vandalizing me, and I love it! They get blocked almost immediately by the RC Patrol, taking care of the problem once and for all. Don't loose heart; remember that nothing they do is permanent. Just revert them, report them, and keep on going. You are a great editor and a great Wikipedian. Don't give up! -- T H L 01:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

They know that they are going to be blocked soon, so they decide to try and take revenge on the people responsible before it happens. By the looks of our in tact user pages, it isn't working to well. Everyone needs some encouragement every once in a while, so don't worry about it. BTW, I like the MGS series as well. Cheers, -- T H L 02:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

I play the Metal Gear Solid games. -- T H L 02:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

It will happen on occasion. It usually happens when users who have selected Remember Me let their friends or family use their computer and not pay attention to what they do. They will then go to Wikipedia, see that they are logged in, and then decide to play a prank on the real user by vandalizing. There may have been instances of someone making a correct guess as to someone else's password, but I haven't heard of any. You vote in my RfA by adding #(Why you are supporting or opposing me) ~~~~ to the bottom of the Support or Oppose section. Cheers, -- T H L 03:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, you applied for semi-protection correctly. Best of luck, -- T H L 15:01, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

The length of the protection is at the discreation of you and the protector. I appreciate your support, but I have withdrawn my RfA. I think that I am a good editor, but I am not ready to be an admin. There is more to Wikipedia then just vandal fighting. -- T H L 20:17, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

You're right about what is #1. I'm not sure if vandal fighting is #2, but I know that it is pretty high on the list. I haven't been adding to and editing pages to much; I've been devoting a lot of my time to vandal fighting. I'll change that eventually, but for right now I'm happy doing what I'm doing. I think that I could use the admin tools as well as anyone else, but they want to know that you can handle yourself with anything before giving them to you. At least I have VandalProof, which gives me some of the tools anyway. Cheers, -- T H L 23:26, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

I completely understand why you would want to call him that, but don't. On Wikipedia, personal attacks are not tolerated for any reason, even when the other user attacked you first. Moving on, VandalProof has been abused before, and it was terrible. What I described to you was the most basic form of the Rollback button; admins have the ability to do all of that as well. That is part of the reason there is so much responsibility that comes with adminship. Admins receive many tools, and have to be able to make the right decisions with them. The Wikimedia Foundation would like us to think of them as "regular editors with a few more buttons", but it goes so far beyond that. Admins will be faced with conditions where they have to make critical decisions, and make them quickly. If an admin makes the wrong decision, it may cause permanent damage. Admins are not just regular editors with more buttons, and being an admin is a big deal whether or not the Wikimedia Foundation admits it. -- T H L 01:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Why don't they wait? Because most of them don't know things like that exist. When I was a new user, no one explained anything to me. All I had was a welcome message to learn basic editing information. It took me months to finally understand that there was a community that decided what took place and when. It took me a while to learn how this community functioned, and how to find my place. Vandals don't even get a welcome message, so they have no way of knowing that if they were to wait, they could be much more effective. However, I may have accidentally exaggerated how profuse the damage would be. Bureaucrats, the people above admins, and Stewards, the people above them, generally have the ability to reverse any damage that an admin vandal could do to the files, and hundreds of users would do their part to revert rollback vandalism. After maybe 2 days the damage would be fixed, and needless to say the abuser is perma-banned. Their IP would probably be blocked for a while as well. Their is almost always a way to fix any type of vandalism. It would probably take a steward to legitimately hurt Wikipedia in the long run. Also, when I told you about rollback vandalism, I forgot that an admin could rollback the rollback. I guess that there is an undo button. Cheers, -- T H L 03:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh, and as far as protecting the Rock's page goes, we typically try to wait a while before protecting a page. No matter how much effort a vandal puts into vandalizing a page, it still takes the same amount of effort from us to revert it. Protecting a page prevents anons and new users from editing it, which also keeps some useful material from being added. We try to avoid this as much as possible, but in some particularly attractive targets must suffer from protection - and they do suffer from it. Cheers, -- T H L 03:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

See User:Jimbo Wales, and the article Jimmy Wales. Cheers, -- T H L 03:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

That information is constantly changing. Pages subjected to large amounts of vandalism on a regular basis are protected fairly quickly. This prevents that list from being stable. -- T H L 00:42, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:Big Boss Award

Heh thank you. =) I'm glad I was of assistance to you. If you ever need any help, you know where to reach me. Nishkid 64 04:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

RE:

It really isn't our place to update the defcon meter. That falls to the people who monitor the recent changes feed, as they are the only ones with accurate information. I'll take care of your vandal. Cheers, -- T H L 17:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

According to your user page history, no one vandalised it. It is still protected. -- T H L 17:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Nevermind, you weren't talking about your user page. I'll take care of the vandal. Cheers, -- T H L 17:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm having some trouble finding the page. Could you please give me a link to it. Cheers, -- T H L 17:28, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I have to go. I'm having some chest pains, and I'm worried. I'll be back on later. -- T H L 17:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I have pneumonia. I should still be able to edit Wikipedia regularly, as I caught it very early. Cheers, -- T H L 23:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I hear it’s amazing when the fameous Purple Stuffed Worm in Flap-Jaw Space with the tuning fork does a raw blink on Hari Kiri Rock! I need Scissors! 61! Big Boss 0 15:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Did someone put Montelbon pheromones in your laundry again? -- T H L 16:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

What? Big Boss 0 19:04, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Montelbon is some made up word used in Homestarrunner.com's current quote of the week. It does suck having pneumonia, but spelling it sucks even worse. Good luck fighting them off. If you want you can borrow my anti-vandal AK-47. Cheers, -- T H L 19:07, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

And who is GW? -- T H L 19:09, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, Metal Gear RAY is far supperior to my AK-47, but it is illegal for you to have that picture on your user page. It is fair use, so having that picture on your page is a violation of copywright laws. Whereas, my AK-47 had its picture taken by the US Military, so it is free use and has no copywright on it. So, I win. Mwahahahahahahaha, -- T H L 19:18, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Oneupsmanship at its best. Big Boss 0 19:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

I only rented Metal Gear Solid 2. I'll find something to defeat your atomic bomb, just you wait and see. -- T H L 19:36, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

I've found it! Caesium pwns your atom bomb. Ten grams of this stuff has the explosiveness of a Depth charge. -- T H L 19:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

What do I think happened to you? I think you drank too much Listerine. -- T H L 19:47, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

It is simply the most efficient method of dealing with them, and it relieves my stress. Remember, you can't spell slaughter without laughter. -- T H L 19:53, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

I just have 3 words for you: Fingerpoke of DOOM!

Main article: Fingerpoke of Doom

Big Boss 0 19:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

I just have two words for ya, Tombstone Piledriver. -- T H L 20:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Douglas, -- T H L 20:22, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

This has been fun, but I have to go. See ya, -- T H L 20:26, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

I had to clean up this page a little bit to keep it clean. Big Boss 0 20:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

It did indeed. It also kept me from being bored for a while. Thanks, -- T H L 22:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Since you are an anti-vandal guy, you may be interested in this tool. It is extremely useful, and it isn't anywhere near as easy to screw up with as VandalProof, or as dangerous. I highly recommend enabling this tool. It is available for anyone to use, and as I said before it is very useful. VandalProof has a lot of bugs in it, so I almost exclusively use this tool. It isn't quite as effective, but it is reliable and easy to use. I love this tool, and I hope that you will to. Cheers, -- T H L 07:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

{{wstress3d|2|200|My stress level is 2}}. That is the basic template for the Wikistress meter. The 200 is how many pixels tall the meter will be. The width will automatically adjust to the height. You can put any number there. And you welcome for telling you about the navigation popups. Cheers, -- T H L 19:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

There was one night that I couldn't sleep, so I came out to the computer and the defcon was at level 2. It was very recent. When I checked back after reverting the massive amount of vandalism on my watchlist, it had gone down to level three. It has been in its current state of bouncing between 3 and 4 ever since then. I haven’t ever seen a level 1, but I have no doubt that it reached that level after that one episode of The Colbert Report. At that point I didn't have the defcon meter on my user page, but I'm sure it reached that level. Cheers, -- T H L 19:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

That would be extremely difficult to do. Even I, with my VandalProof, have the ability to fix a situation that one person could create with one click. Remeber the magic rollback button. It would take an ungodly number of people to create an ungodly level of vandalism. Cheers, -- T H L 20:00, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

It sounded like you wanted one person to cause all of it. For the reasons stated, it is impossible for one person to create a level one situation. Absolutely impossible. It would take tons of different people, not sockpuppets, to pull something like that off. I don't think there would be enough volunteers for what you are thinking. Maybe there would be, but it would only take 2 clicks for each person to stop the entire thing in its tracks. One to block them, and another to roll back their vandalism. I have complete confidence in Wikipedia's ability to handle an attack of biblical proportions. Cheers, -- T H L 20:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

The Wikimedia servers are too advanced and too protected to be destroyed like that. VandalProof may be vulnerable since its core file isn't saved on the Wikimedia servers, but the bots are saved on the WM servers. The ungodly number of admins would be left to rollback the vandalism. Though it wouldn't ever come to this, if necessary some people could be given emergency admin status, and then desysopped after the vandalism subsided. Wikipedia is invulnerable. There is no way to sink this ship. Cheers, -- T H L 20:26, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

The most efficient method of dealing with vandals under any circumstance is to revert them, warn/report them, and ignore them. Go to Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace, learn the warnings, and give them out to vandals. If it may have been an accident, assume good faith and start out with a level 1 warning. Otherwise, start out at level 2. Go through them until level 4, and then report them to WP:AIV. Under any circumstance, do not respond to any threats, and don't insult them. Just give them the appropriate warning for each offense and move on. For previously blocked users, start out with a level 3 warning or the blatant vandal warning. Don't follow a specific user around waiting for them to vandalize; just move on like I said. If they show up in your watchlist again just revert, warn, and ignore. This is the method that has been used on Wikipedia for a long time, and this is the most effective method. Cheers, -- T H L 21:00, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Don't take what I said on the John Cena talk page personally. I was directing it at everyone who knowingly misuses talk pages. Please don't think that I was snapping at you. Cheers, -- T H L 08:00, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Good. I just get frustrated at the IPs who walk in and openly ignore you when you tell them to not use talk pages for a forum. They act like toddlers but swear like sailors, and I get angry. I swear sometimes, but at least I try not to when I'm not angry. After that, two more people started up another conversation on the subject, and ,as you can see if you go to the talk page, I deleted everything related to that subject as promised. I'm glad that you didn't take that personally, as I doubt that you meant to violate policy. I encourage you to delete anything like that from the John Cena talk page in the future. Not necessarily other talk pages, but just that one as it is hit the worst. Cheers, -- T H L 23:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Willy on Wheels by far. Hundreds is as specific as I can get. There used to be a category of WoW socks, but after WP:DENY came into effect it was deleted as "a shrine" to WoW. Cheers, -- T H L 00:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Glad to hear it. Cheers, -- T H L 00:35, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

DefCon level 5 December 26, 2006. 207.69.138.9 01:56, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

DefCon level 5 January 5, 2006. 207.69.136.203 21:54, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

E-mail from WWE headquarters

Please, forward this e-mail from WWE to me at moe_epsilon@yahoo.com so I can confirm this and I'll readd it myself. semper fi — Moe 23:34, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Also, would you mind copying the E-mail onto the talk page of Triple Crown Champion. I would like to keep a copy of the proof on Wikipedia for any future questioners. Cheers, -- T H L 23:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

I was also thinking of doing this on my userspace just incase it got lost. semper fi — Moe 23:51, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, I must go now. I'm not sure why I'm telling anyone, but for some reason I felt compelled to. Cheers, -- T H L 00:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Actually, even if this email is produced, it's still not acceptable for use as a source on Wikipedia. | Mr. Darcy talk 01:37, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

If it is produced, then we would ignore WP:OR for the good of the article. However, I'm begining to doubt whether or not this E-mail actually exists. -- T H L 04:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, it has been a number of hours, and I'm convinced that the E-mail doesn't exist. Big Boss 0, you have lost my trust, and it will take a while to get it back. -- T H L 08:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Logging off til tommorrow. Big Boss 0 00:52, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Seeing as you aren't blocked I guess that you really aren't a sockpuppet. While I'm not suspicious of you being out to destroy Wikipedia anymore, I still think that you never received that E-mail. In conclusion, I'm sorry for being so quick to turn on you and consider you a sockpuppet. Cheers, -- T H L 04:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

More Replies

Go ahead and create the plot section, but make sure to cite sources and insert the spoiler warning templates. The vandalism has spiked because the holiday season has ended, and many schools started up again on Tuesday. To learn how to create talk page archives, see WP:ARCHIVE. As far as Bowser Koopa goes, just ignore him. He is trying to show off. Also, DXRAW is not a sockpuppet of him. I personally testify to that. Cheers, -- The Hyb rid 02:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

I guess that a checkuser couldn't hurt. Seeing as the other accounts are already blocked I won't list them, but I'll go ahead and see if Bowesr Koopa was telling the truth about DXRAW. Cheers, -- The Hyb rid 05:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I think That I have a better solution. If it works I'll let you know. Cheers, -- The Hyb rid 05:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:NWO Championship.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:NWO Championship.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

RE: Orphaned fair use image (Image:The Creator of Light Horakti (Blackheart).JPG)

Regarding the above image, and another that I can not immediately find the name for, are currently tagged as fair use images. I had previously notified you that the images were tagged as orphaned fair use images (the notification has been removed from your talk page). If you have a look at WP:FU you will see the guidelines around using fair use images. The first thing is that these unfree images are only to be used on article space pages only. You removed the orphaned tag and replaced it with the {{not orphan}} tag. These images are still considered orphaned fair use as they are not used in any wikipedia article. Please note that I will be re-tagging the images for discussion at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion where you will be able to state your case for not having the images deleted. As a final note, further to your comment on my talk page of "Do not mess with them again. They are mine and not to be deleted unless I say so." I would suggest you review the policy WP:OWN, which applied equally to images as articles from an ownership standpoint. I welcome your discussion at the IfD or my talk page. Thanks.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 03:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:The Creator of Light Horakti (Blackheart).JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:The Creator of Light Horakti (Blackheart).JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 03:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Magic Dragon with wings.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Magic Dragon with wings.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 03:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Exodia.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Exodia.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 03:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Nightmare 81

Dude chill out before you have a nervous breakdown. Anyway I left that guy a little something to chew on and voted against deletion of the images. Someone messing with that image is denying the existance of that card. It should not be deleted under any circumstance. I'll keep in touch. See you later. User: Nightmare 81

I am back to kick some a double crooked letter. And as you can see I have fixed my fast typing problem. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nightmare 81 (talk • contribs) 20:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC).

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 02:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

New World Organization

I am here Big Boss 0. R007b33rguy 22:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I voted against the deletion of the images. Thanks for letting me in the NWO! R007b33rguy 23:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Please review our policies

Please take some time to review Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:NOT. this is a policy that lists some things Wikipedia is not. Among other things, it says that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Wikipedia is not a MMORPG. And Wikipedia is not a democracy. We don't vote on image deletions. We have rules about them. If they are not being used on articles, they will be deleted.

I'm sorry that you spent time uploading them to no avail, but perhaps you need to consider if Wikipedia is the right place for you. If you are here to build an encyclopedia (which you don't seem to be working on at present) we welcome you and your associates. If you are here for any thing else - we will close your account. Regardless, the images can't stay as they are. Johntex\^talk 03:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

These images are important to PDL and myself personally. They must be kept beacuse I will soon be creating a PDL artical. However our policies differ with wikipedia on the rules and effect changes reguarding PDL. I am taking up all my time worrying about losing my images when I should be editing wikipedia instead. It would be a great help if they were kept so I could move on th other things. I am logging off after this and I will view your response tomorrow. Big Boss 0 04:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello Big Boss, thank you for your reply. I am sorry that your stress level is rising. I know it may seem to you that you are under attack or that we are ganging up on you. We are insistent only because these are important points. They are so important that they are non-negotiable.

You say, "They must be kept beacuse I will soon be creating a PDL artical." - I'm sorry, but you don't get to dictate that. We don't have to keep anything. In fact, nothing will be kept that violates our policies.

You say, "However our policies differ with wikipedia on the rules and effect changes reguarding PDL." That does not make sense. Wikipedia does not allow sub-groups to form who have different policies than Wikipedia has. You have 3 choices. You have to either comply with our rules, comply with them until you can successfully build a consensus of the community to change them, or you have to go away. It is that simple.

You claim you need the pictures for an article on PDL, but we can't keep fair use images unless they are in an article. On the other hand, we have lots of articles with no images. Write the article first, then upload the pictures.

You never explain what PDL is. It looks to me like it is the name of a club or a game you invented. Be aware once again of WP:NOT. Also, WP:V and WP:RS. Wikipedia is not the place for an article on the game you made up at school one day. All of our articles must be verifiable by reliable sources. Whatever PDL is, if you can't cite mainstream media sources about it, we can't have an article about it.

There is no point you arguing these points. They are firmly established policy. I don't want to sound harsh but I prefer plain speaking over you potentially wasting a lot of your time, and the time of good contributors here. You need to understand that we are serious about these policies. Johntex\^talk 04:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

RE

It hit level 1 this morning. I don't know what is going on, but it is time for me to fire up VandalProof. Cheers? -- The Hyb rid 22:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

I was saying that it was impossible for 1 person to pull off a level 1. Cheers, -- The Hyb rid 17:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

My money is on the Undertaker. I have heard that he is going to face Batista at WM 23. Of course, that doesn't mean he will do it by winning the Rumble, or that he will actually be facing Batista, but that's what I heard, so that's my guess. How about you? -- The Hyb rid 03:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I think that unless they bring in new DX members Shawn is going to be leaving soon and until HHH returns. I heard that he has been wanting to take a vacation for some time, and this is his chance. Cheers, -- The Hyb rid 21:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../b/i/g/User_talk%7EBig_Boss_0_Archive_1_764a.html"

Categories: User talk archives | Hardwork Medal