Bidding system

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article concerns Contract Bridge and uses terminology associated with the game. See Contract bridge glossary for an explanation of unfamiliar words or phrases.

A Bidding system is a collection of agreements and conventions describing the meanings of bids used in contract bridge. The purpose of bids is to both describe a bridge hand and propose a contract (Any bid becomes a contract if followed by three successive passes, therefore every bridge bid is a potential contract).

A bidding system defines the meaning of every possible bid by each partner, and presents a codified language which allows the partners to find out about each other's holdings. The language of bidding consists of 35 available bids, plus pass, double and redouble. Each bid consists of two components—the level in range of 1-7, and one of five denominations: clubs (♣), diamonds (♦), hearts (♥), spades (♠) and no trump (NT).

It should be noted that, by the rules of the game, the agreed meanings of bids must be public and known to the opponents. In most forms of play, the opponents are entitled (when it's their turn) to ask the partner of the bidder about the meaning of the preceding bid. (In high-level tournaments, where screens are used, the procedure is to always ask your screen-mate about both his and his partner's bids.)

[edit] Classification

Bidding systems can be classified into two broad categories: natural systems and artificial systems. In natural systems, most bids (especially in early phase of the bidding) denote length and/or strength in the suit (cards) bid. In artificial systems, the bids are more highly codified, so that for example a bid of 1♣ may not be related to clubs at all.

Natural system(s) are a "lingua franca" of all the bridge players throughout the world (with certain regional variations). Thus, a one-time partnership can agree to play a natural system and understand each other fairly well.

Bridge partnerships sometimes alter certain aspects of a system, adding their specific agreements or preferred conventions. Thus, most systems outlined below present guidelines or general frameworks rather than well-defined sets.

  1. Natural systems in general use opening bids as follows:
    • A bid of 1♥ or 1♠ shows at least 4 or 5 cards in the major suit, and 1♣ or 1♦ shows at least 3 or 4 cards in the minor suit. The complete hand usually contains about (11)12-20(22) high card points. As between two major suits or between two minor suits, the bidder opens in the longer suit; with equal lengths, the higher ranking suit is usually chosen. If the opening bid of 1♥ or 1♠ promises 5 cards, the system is referred to as a "five-card major" system; otherwise, it is referred to as a "four-card major" system. The term five-card majors implies that an opening bid in a minor suit bid might show three card length only (for example, the hand pattern might be 4=4=2=3, so neither major suit is long enough to show with an opening bid).
    • A bid of 1NT shows a balanced hand in a narrow high card points range. The common ranges are 15-17 or 16-18 HCP ("strong notrump") and 12-14 ("weak notrump").
    • A bid of 2♣ typically shows a very strong hand (23 HCP up).
    • A bid of 2NT shows a strong balanced hand, usually 20-22 HCP.
    • The meaning of 2♦, 2♥ and 2♠ varies. One common usage is that the bid shows a weak two bid. Another is that the bid shows an "intermediate" hand (20-22 HCP) with unusual length in the suit bid. Yet another usage, popular in otherwise natural systems, is to use weak two bids in the major suits, and 2♦ as Flannery: four spades and five hearts in a hand of minimum strength.
    The most widespread natural systems are:
    • Acol, featuring 4-card majors and weak notrump, originating in Great Britain
    • Standard American, originally with 4-card majors but later adopting 5-card majors.
    • 2/1 game forcing, based on Standard American and gradually superseding it. Some features of 2/1 game forcing originated from the Roth-Stone and Kaplan-Sheinwold systems of the 1950s and 1960s.
    Various developments in the area of natural systems have resulted in systems that are natural in essence, but contain special features. Examples are systems like Romex, Boring club, Fantunes, and EHAA (Every Hand An Adventure).
  2. Artificial systems can be further classified into:
    1. Strong club systems are the most popular artificial systems, where opening of 1♣ shows a strong hand (typically 16 HCP up). Other level-1 bids are typically natural, but limited to about 15 points. The most popular strong club systems are:
    2. In Small club systems, the opening bid of 1♣ is forcing but not necessarily strong. It typically includes some range of balanced hands, some hands with long club suit, and very strong hands. The represents are:
    3. Strong diamond systems are similar to strong club systems, but the bid of 1♦ shows a strong opening, and the bid of 1♣ is typically ambiguous, as in small club systems. An example is Leghorn diamond, played by some top Italian pairs in 1970s.
    4. Strong pass systems are highly artificial and fairly rare. In those systems, an initial pass shows a hand of opening strength (13+ HCP); as result, weaker hands(8-12 must be opened with a bid instead (normally one low level bid is reserved to show 0-7HCP, that bid is sometimes called a "fert", short for fertilizers). Strong pass systems are mostly banned by World Bridge Federation and other governing organizations from all competitions except the highest-level ones, because opponents cannot be reasonably expected to cope with such unusual approach.
    • Relay systems are based on relay bids – the artificial bids where one partner just bids the cheapest denomination (relay bid) and the other describes his distribution and high cards in detail (relay response) using a highly codified scheme. Such systems are out of the above classification (based on opening bid structure), as the relay feature takes place later in the auction. For example, relatively popular "Moscito system" has variants based on strong-club and strong-pass approaches. Symmetric relay is based on Precision club. Relay systems do not need to begin with an initial forcing pass or an initial forcing 1♣ opening. The ACBL typically disallows relay systems, on the grounds that they are too difficult to defend against without a lot of advance preparation.

[edit] External links

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../b/i/d/Bidding_system.html"
In other languages