User talk:Bharatveer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Archive 1: February 2006 - May 2006 ; Archive2 : June 2006 - July 2006 ; Archive3 : Aug 1st,2006 - Aug 9th,2006 ; Archive4 : Aug 10th 2006 - Aug 31st 2006; Archive5 : Sept 1st 2006 - Sept 12th 2006; Archive6 : Sept 13th -Nov 6th; Archive7 : Nov 7th - Dec 4th;
Contents |
[edit] Rv in Tamil people
Reverting unnecesary ruthlessness was absolutely ok. But in the process, you reveretd a new section as well - the section on cuisine, under "culture"! Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Venu62 is making destructive edits
Please revert http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Youngcvb.jpg to its earlier version. I cant do it anymore since I might violate the WP:3RR rule. Venu62 is on a rampage tagging properly licensed images with copyvio tags - I guess this what is called vandalism. Maybe people who are familiar with his destructive POV edits should complain against him collectively. ॐ Kris (☎ talk | contribs) 19:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
This one too http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Chembai2.jpg&action=history ॐ Kris (☎ talk | contribs) 19:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Just a suggestion; take care when reverting so called destructive reverts. The person who has asked you to suggested complaining as a group is in enough trouble as it is. Ncmvocalist 23:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Just wanted to say thanks for your wonderful and valuable contributions to the Carnatic music article. Thanks Parthi talk/contribs 07:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for reverting your reverts. You will agree that the passage is NPOV and is fully cited. I thank you for your help in this regard. I mean it sincerely. Cheers Parthi talk/contribs 09:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] please see User talk:Srkris
please see User talk:Srkris
bye Pluto.2006 10:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Goa Inquisition
I've reverted your edit to Goa Inquisition. Until a consensus is reached on the talk page, the version which does not accuse someone of committing a massacre is the safest version to keep. I understand that there are sources calling it a massacre, but clearly there is some disagreement over their reliability. Please do not revert again, or I will protect the page. --Tango 14:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Elst
Bharatveer, I must ask you to not revert without discussing on the talk page, or at least answering the points raised in an edit summary. On the Elst page, I noted that an alleged connection to the Vlaams Blok is sensibly viewed as controversial, as that party is banned in Elst's home country of Belgium. It would be missing a great deal to reduce the relevant paragraph to merely 'influences'. Please discuss on the talk page. Hornplease 11:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "samskritam"
bho bhaarata-veera, ko-yam khalu "upa-yojakah"? api ca samskrite "maadhyamika" iti maivam prayujyate, bhaashaayam-eva. vijayasva saumya!Kanchanamala 06:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hindutva revert =
Dear Bharatveer, May I know the reason for revert. I hope the content has enough evidance to proof my claims and I can't expect such act from Bharatveer. Please explain me why was my contents reverted? with loveJohn Paul 13:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
