User talk:Beth Wellington

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Beth_Wellington.
This is the User talk page for Beth Wellington, where you can send messages and comments to Beth Wellington.
Please click here to leave me a new message.


Wikipedia:Babel
en This user is a native speaker of English.
This user is a member of the Association of Mergist Wikipedians.
This User is a Member of the Association of Structurist Wikipedians
CSB
This user is a member of the
Countering Systemic Bias
Wikiproject
This user is a member of WikiProject Organized Labour
This user lives in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Search user languages

Beth Wellington is a Roanoke, Virginia-based poet and journalist. She is a contributing editor to the New River Free Press, a book reviewer for the Roanoke Times and a member of the Southern Appalachian Writers Cooperative (SAWC). From 1980 to 1997, she was the founding Executive Director of New River Community Sentencing, Inc. in Christiansburg, Virginia and its predecessor, New River Community Action's Community Sentencing Program. You can find her blog on culture and politics, The Writing Corner, here.

Contents

[edit] User Page

Correct placement--You should put this on your user page, SqueakBox 23:51, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

Thanks! I copied it over there. I didn't realize it was in the wrong place until tonight when I couldn't find my page when I clicked on the link in the history of another page I'd edited. --Beth Wellington 00:57, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

User box thingie--Actually, Vaoverland put it up for me. I can put one on your page, if you like. As far as the West Virginia article goes, I've been doing some work on the sports, cities, and history sections, along with work on some of the subpages. I've caught your name popping up on articles on my watchlist. Keep up the good work. Youngamerican 03:38, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

youngamerican (talk) 22:33, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

It works. As you get more experienced with wikipedia, you can change the colors on the box. I am probably going to change the colors from yellow to old gold, so it will have West Virginia colors. youngamerican (talk) 22:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

colors--If the color name doesnt work, look up a color on wikipedia and find the "hex triplet" id. The one for lilac is #C8A2C8. Use that instead of the name. Hope that helps. youngamerican (talk) 21:15, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

How to archive talk--There are instructions here. Then just create the links at the top however you want them using regular Wiki link syntax. If you like what I did you can just copy it, of course. Make sense? Crunch 12:16, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks--Hello, Thank you for your compliment on my User Page. The concept was mine, but believe me, I had to reach out for the technical help to make it happen. My work (in many ways, life) has been sitting across from flesh and blood people trying to help them untangle the emotional knots they have found themselves in. There I'm comfortable because it's familiar to me. It's taking me longer to be comfortable sitting across from a machine that is essentially 1s & 0s. I am comfortable with the information within Wikipedia, where my task is to extract that information and, in my own way, I hope improve on it. I saw that message regarding Wiki e-mail & wondered what it was wanting me to do & why. The wetter my feet get at this, the more comfortable I feel with the structure, the more I will be able to contribute to the content. Right now I'm still learning. Hope we can connect again. Michael David 13:00, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Signing posts--Hi Beth. Per the userbox at the top of this page, you can sign your posts using ~~~~. Signing someone else's posts is a bit more tricky using the {{subst:unsigned|username|date time}} template. Garglebutt / (talk) 23:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] General notes on editing

ISBN: Did you know if there's a colon after an ISBN it doesn't do wiki-magic ISBN: 1123321312 vs ISBN 2134124242 ? Rich Farmbrough 00:24 25 April 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Stanley Williams

Thanks for letting me know. Someone has already fixed it. The perpetrator is probably a well known vandal. Rich Farmbrough 16:16, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. Replied on my talk page. -EDM 18:39, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

By the way (in reference to your 12/13 blog post), the record is that he was seen to mouth a threat to the jurors after the verdict - or at least words that could be interpreted as a threat. It's at 13654-55 in the slip opinion you link to. I fully agree with you, though, that news reports of legal proceedings, particularly in emotional cases like this one, typically get the legal bits wrong. -EDM 20:20, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, I think its most accurate to say, "mouth after the verdict words that some jurors interpreted as a threat" I didn't get my whole blog entry up, yet since i have been working on the Wikipedia article and one for the New River Free Press. --Beth Wellington 21:13, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Actually there seem to have been two separate comments, which for brevity we can call the "sons of bitches" comment and the "mother fuckers" comment. Both are discussed in the 9th Circuit opinion. Neither is appropriate to appear in the article verbatim. WP:NOT a transcript of proceedings or a play-by-play (though you wouldn't know it from this sad excuse for an encyclopedia article). -EDM 22:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

POV--Hi there. In this edit, you inserted the sentence "And this is actually really sad. Rosa was a hero. This man was a murderer." That point of view can't be put into Wikipedia articles, according to the neutral point of view policy. I've removed that sentence. Jdavidb (talk • contribs) 21:33, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi! Not I. This change was made by http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stanley_Williams&oldid=31373043#Aftermath. It was reversed to my version and then somehow reintroduced!

No problem. It seemed out of character with the rest of your edits (on first glance), so I assumed that with multiple people editing multiple versions, it slipped in. Probably got removed, readded, and removed but you might have been editing the readded version without realizing it. Or something like that. :) Jdavidb (talk • contribs) 22:27, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. I try really hard to edit to change POV errors back to neutral and to use verifiable sources.
(I can't resist) Except for the "really sad" part, the remainder of that comment is straight factual, according to the respective Wikipedia articles. -EDM 22:36, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Movement to impeach George W. Bush

If you're going to add external links, don't try and pipe them; the 1st space after the 1st continuous text element delimits the end of the URI and everything after that is displayed as link text. 68.39.174.238 20:39, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


User_talk:Reaverdrop#Movement_to_impeach_Bush - Thanks Beth - I don't have time now either to do aught except jot this note, I am pulling an all-nighter for a client. Rah-rah for a fellow book reviewer though! I was book review editor on my law review. If I could do that full time, that would be the greatest job in the world. - Reaverdrop 03:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC)


[edit] NPOV tag

I don't have a suggestion, but I have removed it. :) Rich Farmbrough. 22:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sago Mine Disaster

Thanks. You're doing a good job, too. No, I'm not in W. Virginia and, have never even been there. It's a beautiful state. Thanks for the link. Most of my sources are national media (NY Times, CNN, etc. ) though I also used The Inter-Mountain a bit. Actually a lot of my editing has been copyediting which doesn't necessarily require factual knowledge! Crunch 02:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

I'm just a news junkie and I got interested in the story and then was drawn here and started workng on the story. I don't know how much time I'll have to stay with it though in the next few days (busy with the day job, etc.), other than possibly reverting a few vandals. Yes, Phelps is a freak. He doesn't even seem to have a point of view anymore, other than to protest at prominent funerals. I took the first stab at editing that down, because it was perhaps somewhat notable. Looks like someone else came by and decided to cut it out entirely. Crunch 02:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sago Mine vandal

Ah, no problem. That's our job. :) Titoxd(?!? - help us) 04:56, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Reverted to your last version. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 02:33, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
I sure know about Kate's Tool. That's what started everything. :) The best one so far is Interiot's Tool, by the way... Titoxd(?!? - help us) 02:48, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Link format

Hi again Beth Wellington, More good work on the Sago mine story! I'm going through the whole article and cleaning it up and I have a few questions for you:

  1. What do you think about moving and/or copying some of the detail on Randal McCloy's treatment to Randal McCloy. There's more info on 2006 Sago Mine disaster about McCloy than there is on the McCloy page and maybe it should be the other way around. I'm sending this directly to you rather than posting it on the talk page because it seems you've been really involved in that particularly area, but I'll post it there as well.
  1. I noticed you're using lots of external links throughout your writing. I'm not exactly sure of the Wiki style for that, though you use a lot more than most editors. It could just be a matter of personal taste. But one thing I'm pretty sure of is that when you add an external link that displays as just a numbered superscipt you're supposed to also add the full reference at the bottom in the References list (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28links%29). I'm not sure you've been doing this. Crunch 02:40, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Cool about the footnotes. I think Wikipedia is a bit hard to figure out. There are actually tons of rules, depending on which WP:POL page you read. Crunch 03:51, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Citing sources

I think you're right, other editors are under-citing. I did some editing today on Ray Nagin -- I haven't checked back it's probably an active article lately and I've started to add a lot of citations following your model! Crunch 22:51, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] West Virginia

I'd love to help out but I'm not going to have much time for Wiki til at least next week. I know I keep saying this and then here I am, but no promises, and I'm really not an expert on citations. Perhaps if we just make our best effort someone else will come along and make it spiffy. Crunch 03:42, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lyndon LaRouche associate Paul Gallagher

Lyndon LaRouche associate Paul Gallagher is mentioned in some lists of the convicted, but I can't recall where I saw the precise charge. It was part of the LaRouche prosecution so it was most likely a form of mail fraud or conspiracy. Some folks were sentenced to much longer terms than LaRouche, IIRC. Cheers, -Will Beback 11:46, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

FYI, this page seems to have as much detail as I've found anywhere. [1]. Cheers, -Will Beback 23:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi Beth, regarding the conviction of LaRouche associates, the book Railroad, available from the same people also includes FBI and other US government documentation. I know most people think they need other sources to confirm certain things and I fully agree in many respects. There are certain times, such as with a new discovery, one must study for one's self whether the discovery is real or a fraud. I like this method with everything, not only physical science. I have looked at the Railroad book. Its good. Have fun doing your research. I don't doubt that you do a much better job at journalism than the staff of the Wall Street Urinal. Ciao, James NOTE: This was posted by Nemesis1981 10:57, July 10, 2006

[edit] Federation of American Scientists

I believe those projects would require someone a bit more in-depth regarding their subjects, though. But I guess I can write up some basic info and a header/introduction bit, sure. I'll give it a shot. :) :: DarkLordSeth 13:36, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Leonard N. Stern

I have reverted the "coporate office" edit, and made Leonard N. Stern a redirect. Can you look and see if there's any useful info to be salvaged from the corporate version? Rich Farmbrough. 11:32, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

I've cycled the two articles (move one to temp, two to one, temp to two, and fix up redirect, delete temp). Rich Farmbrough. 23:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

I've left her another message. Please let me know if it happens again, I'll temporarily block.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rich Farmbrough (talk • contribs) March 8, 2006 12:46.

I have blocked the anon IP, and left warnings on the other users pages that have done this in the past. Best wishes, Rich Farmbrough 21:03 14 April 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Leonard B. Stern

Simply go to the article and click the "move" tab at the top. Any problems, give me a shout. PS wait 'til WP is back from it's current problems. Rich Farmbrough. 16:25, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

No problem. I left a message for the user, who probably will understand after the Washington coverage why she shouldn't edit that page. Have you tried moving Leonard Stern (publisher)? I've put up a request for an article on [[[Hartz Mountain Industries]]. Rich Farmbrough. 22:32, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Beth, you've done well! Now go to Leonard B. Stern and click on "What links here". You'll see that Leonard B. Stern (writer and publisher) is a redirect to LBS, which is fine, and that Leonard Stern (publisher) is a redirect to [[Leonard B. Stern (writer and publisher)] which is not ("double redirects" don't work - deliberately I think to avoid long chains or loops or redirects). To fix this cut and paste "Leonard B. Stern" into the Leonard Stern (publisher) redirect. Easy peasy. Rich Farmbrough. 22:45, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

P.S. My grandfather had Roger Price's book Droodles it used to make me laugh! Rich Farmbrough.

Yes that looks right. Droodle shows a couple of examples of what was in the book - Stern published it. Rich Farmbrough. 23:46, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] John Dufresne

I didn't actually create the stub - it was written by an anonymous user. I had just made sure it was of stub quality by wikifying and adding a tag to the contributed materal. -- Grunt 15:44, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NSA warrantless surveillance

RWR8189 desires to move NSA warrantless surveillance controversy to NSA Terrorist Surveillance Program controversy. A poll according to the procedure for a contested move is being taken at Talk:NSA warrantless surveillance controversy#Support or Oppose Name Change. You may wish to vote support to change to the new name or oppose to leave the name unchanged. Metarhyme 04:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

It doesn't count where you put it. You have to either scroll all the way down to the Support or Oppose Name Change section or use the Talk: link I gave to get there, edit that and vote below Nomen Nescio. Metarhyme 12:41, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Think nothing of it. I wanted those footnotes templated so I did it. Footnotes should go past 150 shortly - an overwhelming number. Every time I suggest a daughter article it seems like there's a POV attack, so I'm trying not to be concerned about length. Metarhyme 09:38, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Well, you can see what happened an to one idea at Legality of warrantless surveillance - that's the upshot of the all the fuss archived at Talk:NSA_warrantless_surveillance_controversy/Neutral_Point_Of_View_is_not_The_Truth. I decided to append the legal section to the fork but otherwise just leave it alone. Then came the drive from the other side to Rove the title. If the lefty daughter, at which the righties looked and laughed, were invaded with NPOV, then NSA warrantless would be counterattacked with POV I expect. No attacks means I've got time to scope out what Steve Ballmer is up to. In a document with almost two hundred footnotes he told the European Union he's sincere in making Windows® more open. I'll bet NSA warrantless can have even more footnotes than that! So I'm trying not to be concerned about length. Metarhyme 09:49, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
If you know about more than Hoekstra's letter (which is mentioned in the House Intelligence section) and want to put something in, I urge you to keep your addition short and neutral. A fuller treatment could go in the CRS article, which has plenty of room. Metarhyme 06:38, 25 February 2006 (UTC) That was a very good, concise NPOV edit! Thanks!

Well, I solicited shortening again. Nareek responded at Talk:NSA warrantless surveillance controversy#Article Length with a general call to slash without discussion. Metarhyme 06:50, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

I think "the deliberate choice of a modern elite to foster hatred and fear to keep itself in power" (a quote from Leave None to Tell the Story: Genocide in Rwanda) plays a key role - "masquerade of legitimacy" is another quote from the report. What to do about it? Expose it. Congress is inclined towards a bi-partisan effort to create judicial oversight of the Program. Poindexter's data mining concept (killed by Congress) funded DARPA contract F30602-03-C-0037 at PARC. This work could be applied to NSA, which would then have to convince a judge to order particular personal identity filters inactivated. Oversight created, 4th ammendment still kicking. That's optimistic. Metarhyme 06:49, 27 February 2006 (UTC) Gotcha - WP:CIVIL! (Sorry to be so slow.) I accept that "being polite would be untruthful" is an inadequate defense for incivility. I've used thugish right as well. Thanks for politely drawing my attention to this so that I can correct my misbehavior. Metarhyme 22:09, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wilbur Ross

I would leave this one where it is, unless there's another notable Wilbur Ross? The general rule is the article lives under the most common name, but uses the "correct" name internally - or the full name/style in the lead in. Regards, Rich Farmbrough. 18:39, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alberto Rios

Seems not to be a problem any more. Rich Farmbrough 11:31 28 February 2006 (UTC).

Howdy, not a problem, just place #REDIRECT [[page name here]] and save.Nmpenguin 16:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Working Families for Wal-Mart

I think that this one should be OK - I'll ask if everyone's happy to remove the POV. Rich Farmbrough 10:47 2 March 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Walmarting

Proposed deletion--Walmatring, I think is not a conspiracy! People who frequent AfD don't like neologisms, they see very many of them. I'm not sure if they're right in this case or not. Rich Farmbrough 10:47 2 March 2006 (UTC).

Thx for informing me on the matter. I already cast a vote. ;) --Maxl 14:37, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Actually it's 5 votes now to keep the article. The Voting has ended by now with "no consensus" as a result (as you probably noticed already). That means, for the moment the article is no longer on the "delete" list. I'd call that a success! :D --Maxl 16:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't remember editing the article...I've never heard of the term, but will stay out of the vote. Let me know if there is anything else I can do for you.--MONGO 11:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Well, it looks like you improved the article enough to save it from deletion...that is oftentimes viewed as a good thing. Roanoke? My family oftentimes would spend Thanksgiving dinner at the Hotel Roanoke or at The Homestead...this year it was the latter, but I didn't make it there. Nice area for sure. I'm mainly familiar with the northern VA area and northern Shenandoah Valley. Anyway, if you run into trouble....run...no, just ask me and I'll try to help...Wikipedia can be very odd at times.--MONGO 21:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, another neat place with good food is the General Lewis Inn located in Lewisburg, WV...fairly near to the Greenbriar. It's got a lot of antiques from the war of southern independence there...I'm a Montanan (born in Helena), but my the old man is from Covington, and my mother is from near Staunton. You're heading into the best season there in Virginia, the redbuds and all those flowers should be blooming soon. Happy editing!--MONGO 01:18, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Beth, I'm the Anthropology professor referred to in the links for this entry. I've attempted to fill out the definition of Walmarting a little based on my own reading of the (amazingly substantial) literature. I've striven for a NPOV, though I'm not entirely satisfied on this score and would welcome further interventions! best, Alan Aycock (aycock@uwm.edu) Note: The preceeding unsigned comment was added by--Aacock 07:47, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] J.C. Penney and J. C. Penney

J.C. Penney this is the usual solution short of a disambiguation page. Rich Farmbrough 11:57 8 March 2006 (UTC).

Yes, it's not ideal. No, the other Richard Farmbrough is a distant cousin, son of David Farmbrough one time Bishop of Bedford, I've not met him for about 25 years. There is, I believe a third one, who plays amateur sport. His IMDB page doesn't really do him credit, he's produced a lot more television than that (but in my mind's eye he's still about 10 years old). Rich Farmbrough 17:31 8 March 2006 (UTC).

[edit] 1969 Coal Mine Safety and Health Act

Well if you look here you will see at least some acts that have the word "Federal" have kept it in the article title. Are you saying that one of these articles is a WP:copyvio? Rich Farmbrough 13:52 9 March 2006 (UTC).

As I understand it all federal government work is public domain, this would include http://www.msha.gov. Incidentally there's nothing special about being an admin, except for the superpowers we're granted... Provided you're thick skinned enough to take any likley response, you can draw other editors attention to the errors of their ways. Of course we do it in a kind way (WP:BITE and WP:AGF), but as my brother remarked "There are a lot of crosspatches on Wikipedia, aren't there!" Regards, Richard.

[edit] Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977

Thanks for picking me up on the appropriate category. I was on New Pages patrol, focussing on getting uncategorised articles into cats. I wasn't quite sure where to put that one, but figured if I put it there, someone in-the-know would pick up on it. I figure it's best to put these things somewhere where they'll be noticed, rather than leave them to disappear into the quagmire. Cnwb 22:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Organized Labour

Hi Beth. I saw you added your name to the list at Organized Labour, so I thought I'd say hello. As I'm sure you noticed, it's still a pretty small project, so it's great to have another interested editor. Cheers. Chris.--Bookandcoffee 03:30, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ron Rash

Your ref problem was a /ref at the end of the article. Best wishes, Rich Farmbrough 21:03 14 April 2006 (UTC).

Hi there - for reasons beyond my control, the en.wikipedia database is no longer replicated to the toolserver. If this article is fairly new, it would be safe to assume that it is not in the database on the toolserver due to replication issues. Toolserver admins are trying to rectify the situation and I would recommend trying again in a few weeks time. Thanks for your interest. TDS (talk • contribs) 00:34, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

The quotes are showing up OK. I would think that the italics come form the template. Rich Farmbrough 11:44 15 April 2006 (UTC).


[edit] Wikiproject: countering systemic bias

Hi Mamawrites, I wonder if you might be able to help - I'm writing an article for openDemocracy about the Wikiproject:countering systemic bias. I'd like to get some quotes from Wikipedians about why they're involved, what they're working on and some other general issues. I'm particularly interested in talking to women who seem to be poorly represented even on this wikiproject. I wonder if you'd be willing to talk to me over email? Mine is daviddariusbijan@yahoo.co.uk

Thanks,

David

86.8.109.89 14:44, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Maximilian von Spee

No idea, perhaps this is a challenge for User:SuggestBot's owner, User:ForteTuba? Rich Farmbrough 18:43 18 April 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Claudia Emerson

Guess that's sorted at the moment. Rich Farmbrough 21:19 22 April 2006 (UTC).

Well, that will give him something to do. Rich Farmbrough 11:22 23 April 2006 (UTC).


[edit] Dates

Hi Beth, what's the problem? Rich Farmbrough 22:19 29 April 2006 (UTC).

This is due to the way {{tl:cite}} works, which I don't fully agree with, but is no big deal. I've changed the first one, you'll see what I mean. Rich Farmbrough 12:42 1 May 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Folks you meet

Yes, there are many credible folks you'll meet in Wikipedia. Many academics, some wish to not disc;ose their expertise, preferring to edit articles unrelated to their training. I am in that category...I have ot made one edit tomy expertise, instead working on articles that take me back tomy past...land management. While working on the article Retreat of glaciers since 1850, I had the pleasure of working with one of the foremost glaciologists in the U.S., a telescope engineer, a doctor of philosophy (and a computer whiz) and a number of other folks that made the article a featured article...I wouldn't have been able to do this without their help. There are a number of promenient persons that edit here and any expert is always welcome so long as they abide by the principle of NPOV...in some circumstances, some experts have very strong opinions about things so it hasn't always worked out well. Good work and hope you are also doing well.--MONGO 05:34, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Criticism of Wal-Mart

Hi Beth,

a discussion has been going on about the cheap prices at WalMart. Maybe you'd like to say something, too, even though, strictly spoken, this is not exactly about the article. Also, there has been a request to change the name of the article. Please check it out! -Maxl 22:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi Beth,

I understand you're quite busy. I'm still discussing with an user, RJII, and he seems to be a hard core capitalist and he doesn't understand that concessions have to be made in order to keep the economy running. I wonder if he's on WalMart's wage list. --Maxl 21:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wal-Mart

I hope my newly added comment clears things up. I deleted the section, as I said, after a) no one but r3m0t objected, and b) after he let more than a day pass without re-objecting. As I stated in my comment on the talk page, if anyone objects they can revert and I won't get into a revert war, I'll go on arguing. To me it looked like only r3m0t thought the section was worth keeping, and even he'd given up on it. Obviously I was wrong about the latter, but since no one but him has complained about the deletion I suspect I'm right about the former. --soto 10:47, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Scott Shields

No idea, it could do with some content. Rich Farmbrough 18:53 3 June 2006 (UTC).


Please go ahead! Jarfingle 21:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AFD

As an AIW member please review Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of relationships with age disparity and please take a side.

[edit] Wilson Research

Why did you create this entry on WRS? ≈≈≈≈


[edit] Meat puppets

Regarding your recruitment, which was one of twenty made by a new user who's first and last edit was on one AfD he is admittedly linked to, you posted: "I'm curious as to why you would edit my talk page to delete a message."[2]

It is considered highly inappropriate or unacceptable to advertise Wikipedia articles that are being debated in order to attract users with known views and bias, in order to strengthen one side of a debate. It is also considered highly inappropriate to ask friends or family members to create accounts for the purpose of giving additional support. Advertising or soliciting meatpuppet activity is not an acceptable practice on Wikipedia. The arrival of multiple newcomers, with limited Wikipedia background and predetermined viewpoints arriving in order to present those viewpoints, rarely helps achieve neutrality and most times actively damages it, no matter what one might think. Wikipedia is not a place for mixing fact and opinion, personal advocacy, or argument from emotion. Controversial articles often need more familiarity with policy to be well edited, not less. If you feel that a debate is ignoring your voice, then the appropriate action is not to solicit others outside Wikipedia. Instead, avoid personal attacks, seek comments and involvement from other Wikipedians, or pursue dispute resolution. These are quite well tested processes, and are designed to avoid the problem of exchanging bias in one direction for bias in another.

[3] I hope that explains it for you.Nickieee 02:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining, Nickieee. Beth, I've also responded on User talk:Quarl just in case yet another editor is confused by or disagrees with what I did. —Quarl (talk) 2006-08-15 11:43Z

Thank you for your response. I am still troubled by someone editing my talk page by deletion, rather than by adding a comment. I agree that the tone on the query was problematic, and by the way, I haves seen worse, but I took that into account in my response on the AfD page. I do not think that because someone has the philosphy of inclusion, that constitutes the bias that is referred to in the response above yours.--Beth Wellington 16:03, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] International_Institute_of_Management

There's quite a debate on the deletion of this article and I've tried to verify what i could, change the tone a bit and weigh in to keep and improve. Could you look at what I've got there and see if the neutrality and verifiability tags are still needed? Also, if it merits keeping? As always, many thanks. Cheers,Your inclusionist pal in the U.S.--Beth Wellington 20:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment on the tags. It was deleted, but I restored it. The article was likewise deleted. Oh well--Beth Wellington 15:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

No probs. My comment wasn't deleted, though. Rgds Rich Farmbrough 11:39 19 August 2006 (GMT).

[edit] Please help

Hi! I got your username from the Association Inclusionist Wikipedians. I'm trying to work against a band of linkocrites (see en:User:cochese8). You look as if you're a valuable editor and I could really use some help [preserving] a great link. I would ask you to review the discussion and vote keep if you agree with the link's value. By the way, you're welcome to ask for my vote to keep any information on this website. Thanks for your help! Cochese8 17:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Democracy Data & Communications, LLC/Advocacy Campaign Team for Mining

Hi. I was using the National Mining Association article for links to coal stats and came across these two articles, one of which I tagged for different reasons. I suggest you may want to add something to DD&C to show its notability. As for the Advcacy article, I made a note on the talk page re: possibly merging into the National Mining Association article; it wasn't clear why two articles were needed but maybe I'm missing something.

By the way, nice work on the Sago Mine disaster -- you put in a lot of effort!

--A. B. 19:50, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

The Sixteen Ton Barnstar
presented to Beth Wellington for heavy work on the Sago Mine disaster and other mining articles
A. B. 19:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms

[edit] Re: edit counter

That edit counter doesn't work for English wikipedia currently. While it's down, please use Tool1 or one of the other edit counters that are currently working. --Interiot 21:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Your count is 1057 c. 4th November. Rich Farmbrough, 23:44 20 November 2006 (GMT).

[edit] Sago Mine Disaster

[edit] Blogger

Appears to be this guy http://www.aber.ac.uk/cla/archive/biopurdy.html . His blog made me laugh (your comment on my talk page got quoted).

[edit] Reverting a change

If you go to the "history" tab,and click one of the dates you get the version at that time. You can then edit this, and save it to get rid of vandalism.

Rich Farmbrough, 23:44 20 November 2006 (GMT).
I know of no way to get to a specific line, although I suppose a bit of javascript could be written: I use firefox "search - highlight" then scroll. Not ideal. Yes, you have to be able to walk away from online arguments, and real life ones coem to that! Rich Farmbrough, 17:12 21 November 2006 (GMT).

[edit] Second Wave Wikipedians

...it's been a while since I've visited my Wikipedia space. You wrote...

Thank you for the clear explaination. Another user identified himself as such and I wasn't sure what it meant...being a writer, rather than an EE or whatever.--Beth Wellington 05:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

I am primarely a Wireless Network Engineer (yes EE), but I have written a technical text as well which does qualify me as a writer as well ;) Konrad Kgrr 02:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../b/e/t/User_talk%7EBeth_Wellington_72a8.html"