Talk:Belt (clothing)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
~"Sash Shell" and "window sash" need to be somewhere else. --ChadMiller
Contents |
[edit] illegal in india ??
I'm an Indian , living in India .The idea of leather belts being "illegal" in India is simply ridiculos ... Almost all the major brands have showrooms in India and their business seems to be doing pretty well! .. please check/change this
- I have checked this. The prohibition on leather goods is technically correct as it originates from the Sale of Leather Goods Ordinance (No.645 of 1929), however since independence in 1947 the Indian government has not enforced the ban, but nor has it actually repealed the legislation. Royal Mail 23:33 7th June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS to move page, per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 22:51, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Belt (clothing) → Belt — I believe that the majority of people searching for a belt in an encyclopedia will be interested in the clothing item. Therefore, I propose that we move Belt to Belt (disambiguation) and Belt (clothing) to Belt Dave 23:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
[edit] Survey - in support of the move
[edit] Survey - in opposition to the move
- Oppose. It is not clear that this is the primary use given the number of meanings for the word belt. Leaving the dab page where it is, makes it easy to find bad links and fix them. If these moves were made, finding bad links would be very difficult and there would be a large number of readers redirected to the wrong article. That's just wrong. Vegaswikian 20:58, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose like the above user, I'm not convinced that the article of clothing is the overhwlming primary usage. My first thought when i hear the phrase is actually in the astronomical sense like Orion's belt. 205.157.110.11 00:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose as per the above reasons. Bssc81 08:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Nothing wrong as is; different people think of different def'ns.+mwtoews 10:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Not necessarily the primary use. PC78 14:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose, the finding of bad links mentioned by Vegaswikian is especially important in this and similar cases. Gene Nygaard 20:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.