Talk:Bella goth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

keep it!

awesome.. I hope some guy in a black hat doesn't come round and say otherwise... JimmmyThePiep 23:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

I am going to have to be that guy: why must the article always be expanded? Wikipedia is not a game manual, or game guide. Bella Goth is neither a main character or 'important' in any sense of the word - what makes her canon more interesting than the Newbies'? Wikipedia is not a repository of loosely related topics. Additionally, there is no way this would survive WP:NOTE. ALTON .ıl 07:18, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

I dunno.. if you search around there are a lot of forums which discuss the Bella Goth plot ; as opposed to very few forums discussing the Newbies. There's tutorials explaining how to extract Bella, there's a surprising number of decent youTube videos featuring Bella and co. The plot itself is interesting, as well as how gamers have reacted to it.

This could just be my biased view, but I do think Bella and the other Goths are the fan-favourite family of Sims players.

(I also see a couple of characters from older, less-known yet cult-status video games have their own wikipedia pages. I thought it'd be alright to have a popular character in a recent game get a page too.) JimmmyThePiep 07:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Mostly, I agree, but it's always policy to get the last word. I have to leave the deletion notice there, as the article stands because if it's not me, someone else will. I loved the default Goths in Sims 1, and did weird things to their children, but no can do on Pedia. ALTON .ıl 08:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)