Talk:Bell hooks/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have given this article a B-Class rating, and a mid-level importance. While hooks is quite notable within her own field(s), I do feel like it leans towards the lower end of "mid", as described in the biography guidelines.

As to the B-Class, my feeling is that while basic information is presented accurately, and generally well enough cited, the whole article has a bit too chatty tone, and the overall flow is somewhat weak. It is informative, but it's definitely not writing that sparkles. It would also be nice to have more detailed descriptions of hook's concrete theoretical work—if not book-by-book, than at least with more specificity on individual concepts and trends. LotLE×talk 17:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC)