Talk:Battlefield Baseball

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag
Portal
Battlefield Baseball is maintained by WikiProject Baseball, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of baseball and baseball-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.



This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Unknown
This article has not been rated on the importance assessment scale.
Did You Know An entry from Battlefield Baseball appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on May 18, 2006.
Wikipedia
Battlefield Baseball was a good article candidate, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Once the objections listed below are addressed, the article can be renominated. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake.

Date of review: 10 August 2006

[edit] Failed "good article" nomination

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of March 30, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: OK, but needs some grammar and spellcheck work, as well as exansion.
2. Factually accurate?: OK, but needs more references for the information that is missing (see below)
3. Broad in coverage?: This article is not thorough. It should include promotion of the film, production costs and methods, how much the film made, any DVD release info, soundtrack info, a cast and crew listing and any anecdotes of note about the film. For a good example, see King Kong (2005 film)
4. Neutral point of view?: I can see than an effort was made to show point of view, but I added "citation needed" tags to two paragraphs that claim that critics or viewers felt a certain way about the movie, but then doesn't mention or reference proof of this.
5. Article stability? Stable, but actually needs more work.
6. Images?: Only one, but that is good enough, since most pics associated with movies are going to be copyrighted. You might be able to find an ad, but if not, that's ok.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. Thanks for your work so far. --Esprit15d 14:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC)