Talk:Battle of Thapsus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The reason Scipio and most of his officers were all killed at the end of the battle is that Caesar's soldiers were overcome by bitterness and rage ("ira et dolore incensi"). The soldier did the killing in spite of Caesar's direct orders to spare the opponents after surrender. That event is described in a contemporary report: "De bello Africo" (authorship uncertain, perhaps Aulus Hirtius, who served under Caesar), published as "Alexandrian, African and Spanish wars" in the Loeb Classical Library (section 90 - page 278). The soldiers appear to have had a grudge against the upper class officers (senator and knight classes) since in the same after-victory rampage they even slaughtered some of Caesar's officers who were of the same social extraction. I recommend to update the description.
Why, for gods' sake, there is reference to battle of Bagradas in battlebox? the Battle took place almost 200 years before Ceasar's Civil War, nor any Roman took important role in it! I suppose it should be replaced with "Rubicon".--MWeinz 07:08, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Months?
I was looking at this link and they use the same date as this article for the landing at Hadrumentum, but instead of the February date for Thapsus, they have April 4th. Anybody have a better reference? Jolomo 22:38, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] "The battle proceeded peace in Africa"
Does the author mean "preceded peace?" "Preceded" is itself an odd choice of words, but "proceeded" makes no sense at all. I could see "proceeded apace," but the battle is already over at that point in the narrative.