User talk:Barfoos
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Barfoos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Jay (Reply) 21:15, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Andre_Briend.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Andre_Briend.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 17:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Editing the AIDS article
I see that some changes to the wording have been happening, and reversion of those changes, apparently without any discussion on the talk page. When there is disagreement about the wording of a section, please discuss the changes on the talk page. It's helpful to put descriptive edit summaries, which can refer to the talk page e.g. "see talk" or referring to a particular section of the talk page where those edits are being discussed. Editors are not supposed to just revert other people's good-faith changes without discussion or explanation. Rather than repeatedly reverting others' edits, editors are supposed to discuss until consensus is reached before making changes to disputed sections. See Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. I would appreciate seeing the disputed wording discussed in an organized manner so I can see what's going on. I'm putting this same message on a few users' talk pages. --Coppertwig 11:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films banned in Iran
Hi,
I reverted your last change to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films banned in Iran--the organizational rearrangement--for the simple reason that moving a whole lot of stuff around actually makes it more difficult to follow everyone's thought processes in the debate. And, since AfD is not a vote, your well-meaning attempt at organizing the page isn't really necessary and the closing admin will probably want to see how the page discussion unfolded. -- Scientizzle 22:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- PS-I didn't see whether you had actually weighed in on the issue. If so, I may have removed your statements with the revert. Please restore anything I may have inadvertantly removed. Thanks, Scientizzle 22:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)