Talk:Barbara Brennan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.

[edit] Tone

I believe the overall tone of this article to be more dramatically laudatory than encyclopedic. Specifically, I refer to phrases such as "her career took an unexpected turn", and "her career focus shifted dramatically". But more significantly, I dispute the factual accuracy of this article, particularly as it casually proffers as objective reality such new-age constructs as "spiritual perception", "energy consciousness", "Core Energetics", and "High Sense Perception". Lastly, but not leastly, I dispute the factual accuracy of the statement "During her sessions, she started to receive intuitive messages about her client that proved to be accurate" -- I need reliable references for this statement, not anecdotes from Ms. Brennan. BeteNoir 08:28, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

I've changed most of the tone problems in this article to be neutral as a newspaper article might be. There may still be some problems, but I've rephrassed alot and removed some clearly promotional quotes. I think we are close to taking this off the disputed list. 8 December 2005

This article seems fine to me. I guess no one ever removed the "tone" tag, I am removing it effective, now.--Cylon 23:15, 20 June 2006 (UTC)