User talk:Banzoo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Banzoo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Kingturtle 18:25, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Western Sahara

Hi, here is a vote related to Western Sahara, it's about the neutrality of wikipedia in this conflict, are you interested? Daryou 18:25, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Translation request

Hello, I saw that you are a native speaker of Arabic, so I would like to ask you if you could take a look at 2003 invasion of Iraq and Iraq War. There is a featured article in Arabic which we would like to know how it could be used the English one which is of course dominated by people who have either been there as soldiers or have their knowledge from western media. Someone also asked if the section about "related propaganda and phrases" could be amplified with information about the Iraqi side. Maybe there are also people who took photos in Iraq at the Arabic version? Nameme 14:45, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

I'll see what i can do --Banzoo 18:04, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. Nameme 21:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nadine Labaki

thanks a lot for being an initiative to create an article for Nadine. I just wanted to thank you and to inform you that i've made a couple of edits. I am sorry for the mistake in the latest edit's summary (nadine saba instead of nicole saba)!

Omernos 03:44, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for that major edit, although, there is still one missing clip for Noura, one before Ma fina, I beleive it is one of the first music videos created by nadine, but I wasnt able to recall it's name --Banzoo 12:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nabatiyeh attack on house on deletion review

Hi Banzoo, thanks for your notification of the deletion review; however, I do not see a review in the Wikipedia:Deletion review page. Did you file a deletion review request somewhere else? Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 12:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

I m new on the procedure how to file a deletion review process. So my request is not considered as a formal request? thanks in advance for helping me on how to file that. The procedure did not get exactly to a consensus. So I'd like to know the reason why the deletion decision have been validated. Note that this article if it still exists it could've been be compared to a similar attack in Nabatiyeh region that took place on 13 july during this current agression and during wich a whole family of 10 members has been killed including 8 children almost similar the deleted article[1].--Banzoo 13:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Okay, since you're new to it, I'll help you by starting a request on DRV, and you can edit the section to add your comments. I'll let you know when I'm done. --Deathphoenix ʕ 14:20, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Actually, before I start, I just want to point out that the article hasn't been deleted, it's just been merged in content with Operation Grapes of Wrath, where it has a fairly prominent entry. The article is still present in the form of a redirect. The argument is that this is a single event that doesn't need its own entry. It's already featured very prominently in the Grapes of Wrath article. If you disagree, I'll still file the deletion review if you want, but to be honest, with the content already merged elsewhere, and with the AfD being what it was (almost everyone agreeing that a merge is best), I think I followed process. Do you still want this AfD to be reviewed? --Deathphoenix ʕ 14:26, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
I believe that an article that mentions those 2 attacks should have an entry in wikipedia. Will it be all right to start another article about those 2 attacks? or a deletion review is necessary? --Banzoo 14:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
A deletion review would be necessary. However, I honestly believe the deletion review won't succeed because of the overwhelming consensus in the AfD to merge this article into the other article, so you'd be wasting your time. The time is yours to use however you wish, so if you still want to pursue a review, I'll start the process for you. --Deathphoenix ʕ 16:43, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR notice

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. — Nearly Headless Nick {L} 11:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

I'll be glad if u explained to me your move, cause i don't see editing an article more than 3 time per 24 hours (as the 3RR suggests), nor the reason for reverting my edits. Thanks. --Banzoo 14:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Neilswik

Do you an idea how he happened to find The Rocketed Vehicle article? Isarig 21:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Did you try asking him?--Banzoo 21:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm asking you. Any idea at all? Isarig 21:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
And you are asking me for a particular reason?--Banzoo 21:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
You took particular umbrage at my suggestion that he wikistalked me to that article. I'd like to hear your thoughts on how else he found it. Isarig 21:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia is an open encyclopedia, I am not in position to know how someone would have found some page.--Banzoo 21:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm asking you to speculate. Yes, it's open - but an article with such an obscure name - how do you suppose he found it? 01:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Isarig stop your accusation. Peace. --Nielswik(talk) 14:27, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The rocketed vehicle

there is a survey about that article here. As the creator of the article, you may want to say something. Peace. --Nielswik(talk) 14:27, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Qana massacre.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Qana massacre.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Bro, do you remeber what show this comes from? --Striver 22:59, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
I provided the source, yet, someone readded the tag?--Banzoo 00:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rocketed ambulance.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rocketed ambulance.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECUtalk 23:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Qana massacre.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Qana massacre.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)