Talk:Baltimore class cruiser
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Des Moines class should be entirely deperate from the Baltimore class. It was a different hull, with a different main armament. Similarities are superficial
[edit] "most successful class of 8 inch-armed heavy cruiser in history"
Anyone care to back this up? I can't think of any reason to claim the Baltimores were more successful than, say, the Royal Navy County Class cruisers. I understand that there is a powerful urge to claim that "US is Best" on Wikipedia, but this kind of unsubstanciated tosh is of no benefit to anyone. The Baltimores were a successful design - isn't saying that enough? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Getztashida (talk • contribs) 15:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC).
- In lieu of a citation for most sucessful, I have rewritten the intro to show what the class did achieve in terms of long service life and offspring. GraemeLeggett 15:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- The new introdution is muh more informative. Thanks very much. Getztashida 14:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Categories: Start-Class maritime warfare articles | Maritime warfare task force articles | Start-Class United States military history articles | United States military history task force articles | Start-Class World War II articles | World War II task force articles | Start-Class military history articles