B53 nuclear bomb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

B53
B53

The B53 with a yield of 9 Mt is one of the most powerful nuclear weapons built by the United States, and one of the last very high-yield thermonuclear bombs in U.S. service.

Contents

[edit] Development

Development of the weapon began in 1955 by Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, based on the earlier Mk 21 and Mk 46 weapons. In March 1958 the Strategic Air Command issued a request for a new Class C (less than five tons, megaton-range) bomb to replace the earlier Mk 41. A revised version of the Mk 46 became the TX-53 in 1959. The development TX-53 warhead was apparently never tested, although a conceptually similar weapon was detonated 28 June 1958 as Hardtack Oak, which detonated at a yield of 8.9 Megatons.

The Mk 53 entered production in 1962 and was built through June 1965. A total of about 340 bombs were built. It entered service aboard B-47 Stratojet, B-52 Stratofortress, and B-58 Hustler bomber aircraft in the mid-1960s. From 1968 it was redesignated B53.

[edit] Specifications

The B53 was 3.81 m (12 ft 6 in) long with a diameter of 1.27 m (50 in). It weighed 4,015 kg (8,850 lb), including the parachute system (perhaps 400 kg / 882 lb) and the frangible aluminum nose cone to enable the bomb to survive laydown delivery. It had a total of five parachutes: one 1.5 m (5 ft) pilot chute, one 4.9 m (16 ft) extractor chute, and three 14.6 m (48 ft) main chutes. Chute deployment depends on delivery mode, with the main chutes used only for laydown delivery (for free-fall delivery, the entire system was jettisoned).

The warhead of the B53 uses oralloy (highly enriched uranium) instead of plutonium for fission, with a mix of lithium-6 deuteride fuel for fusion. The explosive "lens" is a mixture of RDX and TNT, which is not insensitive. Two variants were made: the B53-Y1, a dirty weapon using a U-238-encased secondary, and the B53-Y2 "clean" version with a non-fissile (lead or tungsten) secondary casing. Explosive yield was nine megatons.

[edit] Role

It was intended as a bunker buster weapon, using a surface blast after laydown deployment to transmit a shock wave through the earth to collapse its target. Attacks against the Soviet deep underground leadership shelters in the Chekhov/Sharapovo area south of Moscow envisaged multiple B53/W53 exploding at ground level. It has since been supplanted in such roles by the earth-penetrating B61 Mod 11. A bomb that penetrates the surface delivers much more of its explosive energy into the ground and therefore needs a much smaller yield to produce the same effects.

The B53 was intended to be retired in the 1980s, reducing the stockpile to a total of 25 weapons by 1987. On 5 August 1987 SAC decided to halt the retirement and return 25 more weapons to service, for a total of 50. Those weapons are no longer in active service, but are retained as part of the "Hedge" portion of the Enduring Stockpile.

[edit] W53

The W53 warhead of the Titan II ICBM used the same physics package as the B53, albeit without the various air drop-specific components like the parachute system, reducing its mass to 3,690 kg (8,136 lb). With a yield of 9 Megatons, it was the highest yield warhead ever deployed on a US missile. About 60 W53 warheads were constructed between December 1962 and December 1963.

On September 19, 1980 a fuel leak caused a Titan II to explode within its silo in Arkansas, throwing the W53 warhead some distance away. It did not explode or leak any radiation.

With the retirement of the Titan fleet, disassembly of the W53 warheads was completed by about 1988.

[edit] Effects

Assuming a detonation at optimum height, a 9 megaton blast would result in a fireball some 1 to 1.6 kilometres in diameter (0.6 to 1 mile) lasting 12 seconds. The radiated heat would be sufficient to cause lethal burns to any unprotected person within 28.7 kilometres (17.8 miles). Blast effects would be sufficient to collapse most residential and industrial structures within a 14.9 kilometre (9.2 mile) radius; within 5.7 kilometres (3.5 miles) virtually all above-ground structures would be destroyed and blast effects would inflict near 100% fatalities. Within 4.7 kilometres (2.9 miles) a 500 rem dose of ionising radiation would be received by the average person, sufficient to cause a 50% to 90% casualty rate independent of thermal or blast effects at this distance.

In other languages