User talk:AWeidman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, AWeidman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AndyZ 18:14, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy

Your article Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy has appeared in the Dead End Pages list because it is not wikified. Please consult the Wikipedia Guide to Layout for more information on how to write a good, wikified article. I would encourage you to revisit your submissions and {{wikify}} them. Thanks and happy editing! James084 13:54, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Mediation @ the John Bowlby article

Hi there! I have taken the mediation case listed here. I have replied on the article's talk page, so if you could reply there with your perspective on this issue that would be great! Hopefully we can work things out. Cheers, Brisvegas 07:41, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AMA request

I read your request for advocacy, and I'd be happy to give you a hand. If you'll give me your permission, I'll have a word with Jean Mercer on your behalf. --David.Mestel 08:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

See my response on my talk page. It would be helpful if you would let me know how you would like our communication to take place. --David.Mestel 06:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Psychology Wiki

Hi Dr. Art! This is Jaywin from The Psychology Wiki. I was wondering if you'd be interested in taking a look at the Psychology Wiki. If you'd like, check out our mission statement. If this project looks interesting to you, feel free to set up a user page. We'd certainly appreciate any contributions that you would be willing to make. Have a good one! EPM 02:09, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please do not show bad faith

When you moved the RfPP section back up, you removed my comment attached to your request that I be blocked. I have difficulty assuming that it was an inadvertent act. Please make sure that you do not blank or remove comments left by other users, as such actions are neither permitted on Wikipedia nor conducive to good faith discussion. FCYTravis 19:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

There was a lot to copy and it was a mistake. As an administrator, I'd assume you'd take the Wikipedia "Assume Good Faith" posture even more to heart and try to set an example. Dr. Becker-Weidman Talk 20:35, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
You've requested that I be blocked for the grand crime of disagreeing with you on an article. I suggest that such inflammatory comments from you make it impossible for me to assume good faith is present in any of your actions. FCYTravis 22:59, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

You are the only one who started and continued the "edit war." You have not acted in a manner consistent with your status as an administrator. You have side-stepped and refuse to participate in mediation; you engage in refusal to assume good faith, and you have misused your administrative rights. Dr. Becker-Weidman Talk 23:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Attachment Therapy.
For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk)
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
This message delivered: 12:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Userbox

I noticed you had the same userbox as me. User:Kaiwen1/Vote to prohibit anonymous edits :) The Filmaker 14:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation over Advocates for Children in Therapy

You have been listed as an involved party in Advocates for Children in Therapy, and I have accepted the case at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-10-07 Advocates for Children in Therapy. If you can please take a look at the case and let us hear your side, I would appreciate it. Thanks! Nwwaew(My talk page) 13:10, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

The checkuser was declined. shotwell 14:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Attachment Therapy

Thanks for your message. I would be interested in introducing some clarity into the position. I was only reading around attachment because a colleague is doing a PHD in adult attachment. As an outside reader I was struck by the defensive attitude and consequent lack of focus of the AT page. It makes the antennae tingle! AT is obviously a fringe thing, but still quite an important one I think given what these people are capable of doing. The Wikipedia article ought to give enough information so that people come away with a clear idea of exactly what it is and what it is not. At the moment, the main focus of the article seems to be to protect DDP. Surely unnecessary? Hughes makes it very clear that he has developed his therapy away from any previous notions of coercion. At the moment I am working my way through the list of therapies on the ACT page that they say are AT 'by another name'. Does this seem a sensible approach?Fainites 21:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/w/e/User_talk%7EAWeidman_1aa7.html"