From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "I don't even really know who this "Chadbryant" is, but apparently Yamla has a pretty substantial vendetta against him. I have made one edit to one article, and that is hardly a suitable criteria to label me a sockpuppet and ban me indefinitely."
Decline reason: "It strikes me as very unusual that a brand new user would suddenly stumble across a content dispute and just happen to take the exact same stand as a recently banned user. See these two edits. Sorry. Luna Santin 22:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "Mormons kick felons out of their church. This should not be criteria for deciding who is and who is not a "sockpuppet"."
Decline reason: "Same as above -- Tawker 00:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
- Your unblock has already been reviewed and declined. If you wish, we can perform a checkuser which will indicate whether or not you are Chadbryant. Please let us know if you wish to do this. I would ask you to please not waste the bureaucrats' time if you actually are, but if you are not then this would be a good way to clear your name. Note that your edit history was used to determine that you were a Chadbryant sockpuppet. --Yamla 23:27, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Please do so. After you clear my name, I will expect an apology. Avenger's Lament 23:50, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Your account was proven to be a sockpuppet of Chadbryant. --Yamla 22:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "I request a review from a coherent and informed administrator who also has the ability to perform a checkuser and clear up any accusations being made by the uninformed."
Decline reason: "Per above. Any checkuser request is going to be rejected anyways because this is a rather obvious case. --WinHunter (talk) 11:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
Checkuser results came back -- see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Chadbryant. Luna Santin 22:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)