Image talk:Autocunnilingus.jpg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
What's that strange looking thing on the shelf to the right? —Christiaan 15:05, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I wondered the same thing, and realized that it could be a (rather clever) reference to Boyle's self-flowing flask", a conceptual perpetual motion machine, displayed on the paradox Wiki page. - 68.20.21.191 15:33, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Looks like a Klein bottle to me. Rather clever; congratulations Rama. Lupo 15:38, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
-
- In my opinion, inclusion of a Klein bottle (which don't exist in 3-space) implies that something else pictured - the autocunnilingus - also exists only in theory. I would prefer it be removed. LizardWizard 00:53, May 15, 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- But they do exist - sort of - maybe it's an "Acme Klein Bottle"? - IMSoP 12:38, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- They exist only sort of. You can pretend to draw one, but without a fourth spacial dimension you don't really get one. Thus, the klein bottle seems to me to imply that autocunnilingus is impossible. Regardless of whether or not that's the intent or even a common interpretation, the bottle is distracting, leading people to ask "What's that strange looking thing on the shelf to the right?" The autocunnilingus should be the focus of the viewer's attention. LWizard @ 18:13, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- I guess I wasn't looking very well, because I thought it was something else entirely. Cough. -Indium 05:58, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Auto-anilingus or Autocunnilingus ???
Well, I'm asking this question because currenty two articles are linking to this image. On one hand, the Autocunnilingus article argues that this image depict Autocunnilingus while at the same time, on the other hand, the Anal-oral contact article depict this act as Auto-anilingus.
Therefore, I'm asking the question: Is this image depicting Auto-anilingus or Autocunnilingus ???
JKleo 19:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- It's not that explicit, so it could be either. It's illustrating the position, which must be practically the same in both cases. I wouldn't worry about it, but if you're really interested, ask the artist, User:Rama. —Keenan Pepper 03:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
