Talk:Australian Ringneck

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good articles Australian Ringneck has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do.
If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.
Birds Australian Ringneck is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. Please do not substitute this template.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

Flag
Portal
Australian Ringneck is maintained by WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia.
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota.

Port Lincoln Parrot should probably redirect to Australian Ringneck, as that seems to be the currently accepted scientific classification common name. --Takver 14:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

I have a check on the name this evening, and if so, we can request a move by an admin. Kim van der Linde at venus 14:42, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. Shall leave it to you to check and contact an admin if a move is necessary.--Takver 14:59, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


This page needs to be moved to Australian ring neck or seperated back out to each sub species as the Port Lincoln Parrot is only a sub species name. The article should have the status for each sub species as the Twenty Eight has been classified as threatened. Gnangarra 00:57, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Moved back to Australian ring neck Gnangarra

[edit] Endemic

Although endemic is technically correct in the context, the general use is for more restricited areas. Maybe we just should avoid the confusion. Kim van der Linde at venus 13:24, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Subspecies status

I do not think the subspecies status is now needed anymore, so we can remove that as the status is the same for all subspecies. Kim van der Linde at venus 02:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

agreed Gnangarra 06:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)