User:Auroranorth/Desk/Filing cabinet/Wikipedia:Release version nominations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] For reviewers of currently nominated articles
- Reviews should only be done by members of the review team (if you want to help sign up here).
- The reviewer should not have been a significant contributor to the article under review.
- Long-standing nominations are a higher priority than more recently added ones.
[edit] Pass
If the article under review meets the criteria for approval:
- Remove it from the list.
- Replace {{releaseversion nom}} with {{releaseversion|class=XX|category=YY|importance=ZZ}} on its talk page. See
{{releaseversion}}below for details about the parameters. - List the article on Wikipedia:Release Version under the appropriate section.
[edit] Fail on importance only
If the article is of acceptable quality, but on a topic outside the scope of the latest release:
- Remove {{releaseversion nom}} from its talk page.
- Leave a comment on the article's talk page explaining that the article has been removed to the "held nominations" page and will be considered for a later release. One comment template is {{0.5 held}}, which only requires a header and signature.
- Move the nomination to the held nominations page.
[edit] Fail on quality
If the article fails to meet the criteria because of quality issues:
Remove {{releaseversion nom}} from its talk page.- Please leave a clear reason on the article's talk page.
Remove the nomination from the nomination list and place it in the archive.
|}
[edit] ParametersWhen editing this template, be sure that the two sizes' (small and standard) text are identical. This template adds articles to Auroranorth/Desk/Filing cabinet/Wikipedia:Release version nominations. This template is used to mark articles that have passed the inspection at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. This template should be used only on talk pages, and is used in the following way: {{releaseversion|class=class|category=category}} Where class is one of the following values, as defined on the WP:1.0 Assessment scale: { class = FA | A | GA | B | Start | Stub | NA } And category matches one of the top-level categories defined at Version 0.7: { category = Miscellaneous | Arts | Langlit | Philrelig | Everydaylife | Socsci | Geography | History | Engtech | Math | Natsci } Also include the parameter importance, which can be one of the following: { importance = Top | High | Mid | Low } These parameters are case-sensitive, so make sure that articles tagged with this template are added to both the class and category categories. [edit] Reviewed articles[edit] CriteriaThe current Wikipedia:Release Version open for article selection is 0.7. The article selection process for version 0.5 has finished, but version selection and publication remain. [edit] Nomination eligibilityPlease note that items eligible for nomination still need to be reviewed to determine whether they are suitable for inclusion. Articles will be judged according to priority and quality. [edit] Release Version 0.5Nominations closed; CD being prepared (as of March 2007) Nominations should be submitted to Wikipedia:Version 0.5 Nominations. Since Wikipedia:Version 0.5 is a test release, the number of articles is expected to be fairly small. Articles need to have no copyright or POV problems. Articles will be judged according to priority and quality. This works out in practice as follows:
We are looking to include the following in this test release:
[edit] Release Version 0.7This release has a broader scope than Version 0.5 and will include many more articles.
[edit] Release Version 1.0Nominations suspended while nominations are open on Version 0.7 Nominations should be submitted to Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Nominations. The scope for nomination eligibility is expected to gradually widen. For now, nominations are restricted to:
[edit] Importance of topicImportance or Priority must be regarded as a relative term. If importance values are applied within this project, these only reflect the perceived importance to this project. An article judged to be "Top-Class" in one context may be only "Mid-Class" in another. By "priority" or "importance" of topics for a static version of the encyclopedia, we generally mean to indicate the level of expectation or desire that the topic would be covered in a traditional encyclopedia. Consider a hierarchy such as History -> History of Europe -> History of Poland -> Polish kings and queens. An article labeled as "Top-Class" for the subject of history would probably warrant inclusion in V0.5, V1.0 and other releases. A "Top-Class" article for the history of Poland would be a reasonable candidate for inclusion, but most "Top-Class" articles on Polish kings & queens would probably not be included in early releases. Nevertheless such ranking within a subject area is very helpful in deciding which articles are included first as the scope of the Wikipedia 1.0 project expands. Quality articles which are not considered to be on topics important enough for inclusion on V0.5 will be held in a held nominations page, ready for inclusion as the scope expands. [edit] Version 0.5Need: The article's priority or importance, regardless of its quality
These criteria are based on those used at the Mathematics WikiProject. Individual WikiProjects are encouraged to incorporate this into their worklists. [edit] Version 1.0The criteria for priority or importance is automatically met by articles on continents, countries and designated core topics. Other articles or lists nominated should be judged relative to entries that have already been found qualified for 1.0. [edit] Proposed initial quality standardsArticles can be assessed using the WP:1.0 assessment scheme. For topics lying outside the core topics and vital articles lists, most articles will initially be expected to be "A-Class" or "FA-Class". At least for now, articles are not expected to reach Featured Article standard. They are expected to be reasonably satisfactory for an ordinary reader. The following are minimum guidelines. Reviewers should use their judgment to determine whether more is required of any given entry.
[edit] Miscellaneous[edit] Version 0.5
[edit] Version 1.0Articles are expected to be relatively stable.
|