Talk:Audio compression (data)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There's an interesting aside here relating to midi and pianola. Both these techniques are extremely effective lossless compression technologies but solve the problem in a quite different way. User:Rjstott
I have moved the page Audio compression to Audio data compression because I believe it more accurately describes the topic of discussion and leaves the original page for a discussion of audio compression in recording.
-- Jul 7, 2003 Ap
- Audio compression is now a disambig, as it should be. - Omegatron 23:02, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
Under the section titled "Lossless compression", it is said "...audio waveforms, which are generally difficult to simplify without a (necessarily lossy) conversion to frequency information...". I dispute that conversion to frequency-domain is necessarily lossy. 57.66.65.38 13:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)Andrew Steer www.techmind.org
can someone tell me any simple algorithm to compress a wav file back to a wav file. i'm not sure if lzw will work. Xhamlliku
[edit] Latency
"In general, latency must be 15 ms or lower for transparent interactivity."
This is nonsense. Transaltanic telephones calls always have a latency significantly greater than this, thanks to the distances involved:
15,000,000 round trip / 300,000,000 metres per sec = 50 ms.
With modern telephone systems it is difficult to impossible to notice any latency. I have chopped out the above sentence.
[edit] lzw compression of wav file
I don't know where user Xhamlliku went but I know of no reason lzw compression wouldn't work with a .wav file.. Charlie 11:52, 26 October 2005 (UTC)