Talk:Ashida Kim

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ashida Kim article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

Article policies
Wikipedian This article contains biographical material about a person who is or has been a Wikipedia contributor. Wikipedia policies are in place to ensure that the subject of such material does not exert undue influence over its content. However, the nature of Wikipedia is such that, as with all its articles, misleading material may be present.


Readers are encouraged to review Wikipedia:Autobiography for information concerning autobiographical articles on Wikipedia.

Peer review This is a controversial topic, which may be under dispute.
Please read this talk page and discuss substantial changes here before making them.
Make sure you supply full citations when adding information to highly controversial articles.
An individual covered in this article, Ashida Kim, has edited Wikipedia as
Ashida Kim (talk contribs).
Troll warning This discussion page may contain trolling. Before you post any reply, consider how you might minimize the effects of trollish comments. Simply ignoring certain comments may be the best option. If you must respond, a temperate response is always best, whether trolling is suspected or not.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 18 September 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article was nominated for deletion on October 4, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. An archived record of this discussion can be found here.

[edit] Kim Vs Davis

Which should be used during the article, as one is an alias? --Nate 14:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

He's popularly known and published as Ashida Kim, but there's strong evidence suggesting his actual name is Radford Davis. I think the article as it stands with the mention of the evidence for "Radford Davis" is good. --Scb steve 00:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] YouTube "Fight" Video?

Anyone know the story on this? Should it be referenced in the article? I'm rather suspicious myself. --GenkiNeko 19:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

What would it add to the article, even if we could prove that it was Kim behind the mask? Blast 06.04.07 1201 (UTC)