From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 DISCUSSION symbolic anthropology article 1.1 Chauncey Matthews 1.2 Mumford 1.3 Melville/vandalism 1.4 Image:Chauncey_promo.jpg

[edit] DISCUSSION symbolic anthropology article

July 8/9, 2006 There is an article for symbolic anthropology. But for some reason the link doesn't work. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_anthropology I don't know...

... OK so I posted a question about how to fix this linking problem, I think it is item 119 at the bottom of the page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29

If you don't know how to fix the link problem, please don't take out VALID article links, even if they ARE red. Someone else may be able to figure out how to fix them. Thanks.

Also, please do a SEARCH for these links BEFORE you delete them. You will see that articles DO exist for these topics.

Just deleting nonfunctioning links does not help. There ARE articles on these topics! The help information tells us to go ahead and include links even if we don't know how to make them work, because someone else will know how. I am following the proper procedure by keeping in the red links.

[edit] Chauncey Matthews

Chauncey Matthews has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 15:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. You'll see from the page history that I did not propose the article from deletion [1]. Instead, I noticed that it was up for deletion and thought you'd want to know.

I'm sure this person had no intentions of singling out Chauncey Matthews, but simply didn't happen to see the other articles. If the articles don't meet the notability guidelines, they should probably all be deleted. You can do that yourself if you think it's necessary. Hope that helped. NickelShoe (Talk) 11:43, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mumford

Thanks a bunch for digging up all those insights. I hadn't heard any of them before. Please feel free to return! =)

Yeago 01:45, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Melville/vandalism

Many thanks for the nice comment, Asedzie. Keep up the good (and fun) work, and don't let the vandals get you down. They're just minor annoyances and their 'work' is easily reverted. -- Rizzleboffin 22:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Chauncey_promo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chauncey_promo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —xyzzy_n 03:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)