Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Andrew Nellis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page was deleted unfairly by the wikipedia admin. They say in their rules that consensus is required for the deletion of an article. Funny, there was no consensus here. The whole gang of morons who called for deletion were from one particular IRC channel on Dalnet (#atheism), although some were also from #memes. No consensus was reached. This article should come back immediately. Further discussion will be made in the deletion review page. Meanwhile this page is archived on anarchopedia's site. Andrew on anarchopedia--Fmaack 14:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- How hilarious is that? A reverse meat-puppeting of a genuine article with valid content. I guess according to wikipedia policy, it's okay to gather a gang of people you are personally affiliated with to make a bunch of bad-faith deletion votes.. But heaven forbid a few people with personal affiliations with eachother attempt to keep the same article. What a bunch of morons. Drvoke 17:29, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- I am a new user and am rather disillusioned by this process. I AM NOT A SAP OR A SOCKPUPPET. I live in California and am a law student who has never heard of Andrew Nellis until I saw this AfD and did some research. My understanding is that deletion of an article requires consensus. The stated reason for deletion discounts all SAP and sockpuppet votes, I wonder where exactly that puts my opinion. I have enjoyed contributing to WP but if I my views are going to be discounted out of hand, I wonder if any of my contributions are worthwhile. I really don't mean to sound like a petulant child, but this process does not strike me as fair. Ratherhaveaheart 21:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
