Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/bopo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] bopo

This article writes more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia entry. Also is written from 1st person (from bopo's person), which strikes me as a possible copyright violation. This article was originally a {{prod}}. But User:bopobopo removed it. Thanks! Deon555^talk_Review 06:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - advertising, for (how novel!) yet another prepaid credit card for people with rotten credit. OUT!!! --Brianyoumans 06:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• "So what is a bopo card I hear some of you ask?" Um... no, we didn't ask. Delete per Brianyoumans - blatant advertising. Zetawoof^(ζ) 07:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom and above, as well as WP:VAIN. --Dennette 09:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete advertising only. Nigel ^(Talk) 12:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Bopo bop a lu lop, a lop bam boom, delete as above. NawlinWiki 13:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, blatant WP:VSCA. --Kinu ^t/_c 14:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 19:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per others. -Elmer Clark 21:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - reads like an ad, IS an ad. -- Picapica 09:42, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - just another reason why we need a CSD for blatant spam. -- Tivedshambo (talk) 16:47, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.