Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoia Birmingham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 00:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zoia Birmingham

Looks notable enough, but this is purely a CV that looks like it comes straight off another website, and with unfree-looking images, too. No qualms about keeping it if it's tidied up to gfdl standards, but this looks bad. Grutness...wha? 22:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Note: I removed all the npov/unencyclopedic descriptions in the article. —EdGl 22:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

• Text is pure copyvio from her website and images taken from there too. Unclear if the wiki article is by her or a fan, but either way. Can one tag an AfD'ed article as speedy, or use the replacement "this is a copyvio" page, or do we waint for an admin to process the AfD here? DMacks 00:26, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - This article provides no verifiable sources to establish notability. - Shaundakulbara 04:53, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Created by Abctf, a single-purpose account. --Dhartung | Talk 06:48, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete If the entire content of the article is "borrowed" then what choice do we have but get rid of it? User:Dimadick

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.