Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zig Zag Cat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete for the zig, AYD!. - Mailer Diablo 12:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zig Zag Cat

Zig Zag Cat (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable game. The article reads like a first-person account of someone who played the game, not a third-person account of someone describing the game. I found less than 1,000 ghits, which is below the threshold of notability for a video game. Note also the well-placed cleanup tags. YechielMan 05:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

• I like it when an article is 2/3 cleanup templates and only 1/3 prose. But, what is the consensus on video games? I mean, this game clearly exists; what is the threshold? -Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 06:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:SOFTWARE. MER-C 12:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Existing is not enough. It seems not to reach the threshold. User:Fundamentaldan 22:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.