Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zazzle.com

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Woohookitty 06:18, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Zazzle.com and Zazzle

Advertisement --Gunmetal 21:52, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - advert -- Francs2000 | Talk 21:55, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy as copyvio from http://www.zazzle.com/welcome/first/about-us.asp Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:57, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
• delete still spam Hansonc 21:56, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

  (Cut and pasted from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Zazzle -- Francs2000 | Talk 22:00, 18 July 2005 (UTC))

• Delete both, advertising. JamesBurns 08:23, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete advertising Eclipsed 22:45, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep but clean up the POV crap.--Daveswagon 13:13, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete both. 205.188.116.135 13:31, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Cleanup to remove advertising tone, Alexa #6,968 doesn't quite make it but 120,000 hits and recent buyout by Google do. Dcarrano 17:01, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
• Cleanup how is it different than Cafepress page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cafepress -- 12:48, 24 July 2005 (PST)
• Cleanup make it more neutral; Cafepress's page should be more neutral too -- 01:27, 24 July 2005 (PST)
• Keep and cleanup. Isn't cleanup the same as keep? And wouldn't it probably have been fix by now if it had just gotten a cleanup tag in the first place instead of vfd? The company itself is clearly notable. Just do a Google news search. --Sketchee 13:35, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.