Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zarafa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. TigerShark 11:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Zarafa

Not notable. 100 google results. Does not meet requirements of WP:CORP. Sleepyhead 13:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. incog 21:44, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, but improve the heavy rewording that has been done already. -Mardus 17:01, 31 May 2006 (UTC) | Other similar software titles' articles with better style could also be taken as examples. I dont totally agree with this deletion, true that the zarafa isnt well know, but i have been looking for exchange alternatives and there arent many and most of then are little known, mostly only open-source exchange alternatives have many references. for now i'm happy that this is wasnt already deleted. anyway thanks for wikipedia.

I cannot see that it meets the notability criteria of WP:CORP or WP:SOFT, thus the article has been nomiated for deletion. Your vote have not brought any evidence that this company is notable - in fact you are stating that it is not. --Sleepyhead 06:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

• This nomination was incomplete, listing now. - Liberatore(T) 18:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete WP:SOFT - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 18:35, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:SOFT, fails google test, generally fails notability —WAvegetarian•(talk) 08:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.