Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zach Grooten

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 02:30, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Zach_Grooten

Vanity page or misplaced user page. Sanbeg 16:57, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

• Strong Delete* - the whole way it is written is like a user page. Zordrac 23:15, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Flapdragon 00:45, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Izehar 23:50, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep THIS PAGE !!!!!THIS PAGE IS AWESOME I DONT KNOW WHAT U GUYS ARE TALKING ABOUT!!!!!!!!!!

IT ROXORS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IT ROXORS comment by 70.118.250.12 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) who also vandalized this AfD page by erasing all other votes.

• Delete per nom. -- Antaeus Feldspar 19:54, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

The page should be kept, it does no harm to anybody and does not inhibit viewing of any other article. If you disagree and wish that it be removed, you should realize that you could just avoid going to it entirely. I say keep the page because it is not detrimental to anything.

• delete as per nom. Previous commentator (68.205.81.26) is politely encouraged to go read up on Wikipedia's policies, aims, etc. Pete.Hurd 23:57, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.