Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yu-Gi-Oh! single card articles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all articles. - Mailer Diablo 00:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A Legendary Ocean, The 13th Grave, Terrorking Salmon, Deepsea Warrior, Swordstalker, Skull Servant, Gyroid, Mythic Dragon, Gagagigo, Giga Gagagigo, Gigobyte, Gogiga Gagagigo

All of these pages should be deleted; they are unencyclopædic wastes of space. The cards described in these articles are non-notable, and if we have articles on these cards, what stops us from having articles on EVERY card? In addition, there is bound to be copyright violation somewhere along the line. (NOTE: some of the cards in Category:Yu-Gi-Oh! cards are notable, such as Obelisk the Tormentor.) Setokaiba^✌_≝ 11:53, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Delete All Fancruft. These cards can all have thier own pages on Yu-Gi-Oh Wikicities] (which could use the content), but we don't need all of that here. -- Vary | Talk 16:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete cardcruft. I've said it before and I'll say it again - get rid of cardcruft. Even the Power Nine from MTG don't get their own individual articles. --Cyde Weys _vote^talk 16:04, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all, except Gigobite, which could be made a redirect to Gigabyte, as I could see someone with bad spelling searching for that word. Youngamerican 18:18, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all fancruft. feydey 19:54, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all and ask the author to contribute to Yu-Gi-Oh wikicities. --Quarl 21:23, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all. Note precedent by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yu-Gi-Oh! card lists. --Apostrophe 22:32, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all, including Obelisk, per Power Nine precedent. -- Grev 00:51, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Gyroid and replace it with... I dunno, maybe the OLD article about GYROIDS?
• Keep Swordstalker has been updated. --Jingofetts 15:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Delete- this is about a damn card and nothing of any significant importance. Why are we debating this?

• "Keep" How come there are articles about every single Pokemon but you don't want any articles about a few Yu-Gi-Oh cards? You're all a bunch of Pokemon fanboys and fangirls.
  • Haha, for the record, if any Pokemon card came up for deletion I'd be for deleting that too. --Cyde Weys _vote^talk 00:16, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.