Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yesterday Was a Lie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —bbatsell ¿? ✍ 16:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yesterday Was a Lie

Yesterday Was a Lie (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Crystal ball article on a film which has not even begin shooting yet, so may be entirely different by the time it's released, if it ever is. Guy (Help!) 22:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Important enough to have a featured panel at Wondercon, a pretty important convention. Stars Chase Masterson, a fairly well-known actor in sci-fi circles. --badlydrawnjeff talk 12:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. According to IMDb and the film's official website the film has been shot and edited and is currently being scored. The film also has a consistent rating of around 20,000 or higher on the IMDb film meter indicating a high level of popular interest. Numerous press/media websites and TV series are covering the production of the film; e.g. SidewalksTV], a nationally-syndicated television program (note that this website even has a link to the Wiki entry on Yesterday Was a Lie). The premise of deletion is therefore invalid. Sorrywrongnumber 20:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  • P.S.: I have added several press/media links to the main page, including a link to the WireImage page covering the film's wrap party, further illustrating that Guy's basis of deletion (that the film hasn't shot) is incorrect. Sorrywrongnumber 03:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. Where do people think they got footage that is as beautiful as what is posted on the film's official site? I don't understand why this unfounded (and curiously negative) comment was even considered. 2Misters 02:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. This film looks great from what I've seen so far. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.185.200.165 (talk) 03:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC).
  • Please note that WP:ILIKEIT is not a valid argument. Corvus cornix 21:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
    • True, but in fairness you should also point out that the premise of deletion (that the film hasn't yet shot) has been demonstrated to be false, so it is also not a valid argument. Sorrywrongnumber 03:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.