Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xenophase

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 07:48, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Xenophase

This page seems to be written almost entirely as an advertisement. Alexa tells us the website itself isn't notable enough, but Google tells a slightly different story. However, since I'm guessing a lot of those Google hits are forum-related to try to ask for the server address (or something..), I'm voting to delete this page. JHMM13 (T | C) 21:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Keep It might just be me but it is informitive enough and has been mentioned one or two times on G4techtv to be notable but not signifigantly. MAZO 22:21, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

• Netcraft also seems to have a better outlook for this site, as well.
• Kepp appears to be notable enough, per Alexa rank. Stifle 01:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• I don't see how writing a description in an informative way can equate to an advertisement. Seeing as how the site is "referrals only" I don't think advertising will be of any help. Besides...It is notable enough to be mentioned by G4techtv, so I don't see any reason for deletion. Why not keep the page? - CriminalNerd —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CriminalNerd (talk • contribs) .
• Keep --Terence Ong ^Talk 11:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.68.25.109 (talk • contribs) .

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.